Both of those seems very rational in term of maximazing value.

What’s /c/ here?

You’ll realy enjoy this:

https://www.boredpanda.com/worst-domain-names/

You are observing just one side of the equation: people who watched adds are using a product.

You don’t see the other part that is the problem. Cos of running those ads is higher than a profit gained from additional sales.

A similar case was with scans from “mobile scanners”. Since those are used on patients to sick to be transported, their cases were disproportionaly “malicious”. Model was effectively optimozed to detected if scaner was stationary or mobile.

Thank you. At glance it seems like the difference between CC0 and CC-SA in copyright with some additiona rules about what exactly count as “publishing” stuf. That was very helpful.

So… OP’s “hot” take is “losers exist”?

What’s the main difference between those licenses?

Not a coder. But knowing basic regex, makes my life so much easier. Even in things like excel.

But that’s just inconsistent with the state of of current scientific knowledge.

Being poor makes you less likely to make a long term decision, not the other way around. In societies where income varies from season to season, you literally have less smokers when the money situation is good and more when the situation is bad. Long story short fighting for survival is extremely cognitively tasking. Thinking and planing is, literally, harder if you burned those resources on “what to put on the table… today”, problems.

People are default “opportunistic”. We need to design the environment to give them more oportunities to do good and less to do bad if we want to see “wholesome” channels grow.

Digital Marketing doesn’t work. Digital Bubble is here and it will burst hard ending the “free internet” in a process. The more you work in marketing, the less you are inclined to agree… or even listen…

This will not be preaty.

You are describing Google Ads right now. Algorithms are better and better in reaching to poeple that are already on the purchase patch. It’s like giving a restaurant flayers to people that are waiting for a weiter to show them a table.

Aren’t our ads amazing? Look, almost everyone who saw them made the purchase!

Analytics that ignores Goodharts law ruin everything. Movies, HR, Marketing (not much to ruin left, but you get the point), performancet review, recommendations…

Has been

Very cool.

Alternative headline: Hospital administration getting prises from cancer.

You seems to think the entire process is “our model is missing something, so we made up so shit it kind of works and call it a day”.

In fact it’s A) our model is missing something B) it would work, if X was true, so to check if it could be valid… (And this part is crucial) C) …lets consider what else would be true if X was true. What else (from outside the model) can we measure? Would the result be different if X was true or flase? Let’s make predictions and see, see how well we did.

It’s not A) The car stopped. Car that wouldn’t have gas would stop. Ergo we belive that car don’t have gas.

It’s B) car have stopped. Car that wouldn’t have gas would have stop. If car don’t have gas, we would expect it to be lighter than cars with gas and we would expect a driver to go out with cannister and move in the direction of gas-station… and we weight the car, and look for a driver moving on foot. Only, once our predictions are confirmed we update our model.

Is it 100% correct? No but it’s a systemic and reasonable aproch of moving model closer to the truth.

Hi. I think you combined comments of two separate people as coming from one person. My understanding is that OP agrees that your reasonable perspective is valid and reasonable and will do it’s best to be considerate about things like that it in the future.

It walks, sounds, smells and looks like a bullshit. I wonder what could it be?

‘So where fans can find you now?’ He asked, so she didn’t hesitate to share links to her books and arts.