iZom

Stares: I don’t get it.
Squints: I still don’t get it.
Squints harder: gasp!

Are snow balls still ok?

Didn’t need to click the link, the guitar riff just started playing in my head.

Wait… I thought those only existed on Dark Bramble??!

Maybe one day I will be making lots of money and will want to pay less tax. I better start voting tory… Is that how they think people think? Or even worse, are there people who really think like that?

Does that mean the ‘P’ was supposed to be silent? You don’t say puh-terodactyl without getting laughed at in school… Um, probably!! So, is it a actually called a helicoter?

Early 2000 web was the best web. Our student flat had just moved from dial up to ASDL so download speed felt incredible. I would StumbleUpon new an fantastic websites all night long. Play Flash games for hours. Or with friends, gross ourselves out on rotten dot com. TPB and Limewire to build my music library, but always seeding above 1 of course because sharing is caring. And not forgetting the chatrooms…
When Jack from Lost said “We have to go back!!”, this is what he was talking about.

Tesla ticks both these boxes.

It takes a lot of money to bribe um… I mean lobby for change. By being disruptive you raise awareness and get media attention that makes the situation harder to ignore.

This is just little people with a normal double bass and violins.

Shveeooyeeoong

$10?

“Could be”, “suggests”, “first study”, “thought to have” … looks like there is some more science to be done here.

I’m in a similar position, but it’s the Brewster’s Millions conspiracy for me.

I’m a hoarder in these games. If I can store all my stuff back at my base like in Fallout 4 and Skyrim then I’m happy. As long as they don’t pull the Fallout 76 stunt where you need to pay monthly for extra storage.

Just popping by to say “Fuck Nestlé!”… That is all.

Have you checked the settings in BIOS?

Outer Wilds

Skyrim… no, Fallout (maybe NV, maybe 4)

Witcher 3

Glad this is working for you. Using TOP probably was a bad idea and I think the way you used RANK <=1000 is a better approach.

If there was a way to safely exclude any of the records - like if you knew that when published was older than X days/months/years it would never make it into the final results, you could filter them out before ranking them. That might squeeze a little more performance out of the query, but could be risky if the data isn’t predictable enough.

I think you can use RANK as a window function and specify TOP 1000