[…] i don’t appreciate how you deleted then reposted to spam my notifs.

What? I haven’t deleted, nor reposted anything in this context. Are you sure you aren’t just getting a ping because I @mentioned you in the comment’s references ^[1]?

I think OP is editing this comment ^[1] in bad faith:

• Current version ^[1.1]:

  

• Original version ^[1.2]:

  

Please tag your post as a joke, not real, or similar. If you leave it in its current state ^[2], you are knowingly peddling disinformation ^[1].

Update (2025-03-06T01:45Z): OP has modified the post’s body stating that it’s a fake tweet ^[3]. Imo, the title should preface that it’s fake ^[1].

[…] I’m not sure […] voting on each defederation is necessary. […]

My proposal does not include voting on cases of defederation.

[…] I am not sure engaging the admins in a philosophical debate about why they blocked an instance is going to be productive. […]

To be clear, I didn’t specify that the admins would be required to engage with and resolve every comment that they receive on the posts about the instances that they are defederating from; they simply have that option. The main aspiration of the proposal is that the admins simply provide their rationale for defederating an instance when they do so. I wasn’t advocating for some involved process where they must receive agreement and input from the community before a defederation occurs (though, I don’t necessarily think that is entirely a bad idea).

[…] it’s potentially the hundreds of options that would need sorting through from the users. […]

I’m not sure that I understand; could you clarify what you mean?

An update for anyone finding this in the future: This proposal has been implemented! ^[1]

Ahh, okay. I misunderstood the intent/direction of this one. Thank you for clarifying 😊

Wouldn’t auth-right be the ones wanting to keep the monarchy?

[…] If you don’t support imprisoning people who hold these views that directly lead to the death of many innocent people, the taking over of people’s land/homes, the destruction of democratic systems, and the elimination of entire races of people from populations, then you are inherently tolerating their beliefs.

To me, it feels like you are conflating some things here: I draw a distinction between how I try to conduct myself (and, by extension, how I think society should conduct itself), and how I think a government should conduct itself. Any common overlap, while it may theoretically draw from the same core personal beliefs, is more of a coincidence in practice, imo. Yes, I think that society should not socially tolerate any of these behaviors, and I think that society should take an active position to socially oppose them; but I don’t believe that a government should take action unless the well-being of an individual is actively under threat.

I could be wrong in my interpretation, but all of your examples seem to simply a be a difference of opinion (no matter how abhorrent and unpalatable an opinion may be). I don’t believe that one should be legally punished for a difference of opinion. The only one that may have some legal ground, in my opinion, as I currently understand your examples, is

Supporting dictatorship, authoritarianism, or totalitarianism as a concept or goal

but that would depend on how you are defining “support”.

[…] [he shouted] out a straight up neonazi propaganda channel as one of his favorites […]

Do you have a source?

I wonder if he’ll make a video (if he hasn’t already) on why he chose to switch to Linux; I’m quite interested to hear what made him decide to switch, and I’m also very interested to hear what issues, if any, he encountered along the way.

Zero. I believe that the negotiations of an employee’s market value are between the employee and their employer. I don’t believe that it is my responsibility to charitably subsidize a company through the subsidization of their employees’ wages.

Transphobic main dev […]

Do you have a source?

Thank you for verifying 🙂

I swear, that text looks both blurry and sharp at the same time.

Hm, my guess would be either “cube control” or “cube C-T-L”.

EDIT (2025-02-28T09:02Z): Hm, actually, given that it’s for Kubernetes ^[1], maybe it’s “koob control” or “koob C-T-L”… ^[2]?

Do you mean /ɲiɲks/?

Here are the sounds for each:

• ɲ ^[1]
• ŋ ^[2]

No ^[1.1].

EDIT 2025-02-28T10:17Z: Actually, @[email protected], I was wrong in my initial interpretation ^[1.2]. So, from what I can tell, you are, in actuality, the only one itt! 😊

Basically, every search engine has incorporated LLMs and are shoving them down your throat. If we are talking about tools that I would find useful I’d rather have a reverse image search. […]

So, for clarity, are you saying that a reverse image search tool is more useful to you than AI integration, yet search engines are pushing for AI integration rather than reverse image search tools, and they may not have reverse image search tools at all?