I mean fundamentaly your question is "Why do people have different preferences? " and I think that’s a very interesting question, with philosophical as well as economic implications.

All we can say for sure is that individuals do indeed seem to have different preference, without clear criteria across individual people.

For example, if Jill has the opportunity to purchase either wine or beer, and both are the same price, same alcohol content, same social implications etc, we have no way to predict which Jill will choose based on the information available in the world outside of Jill consciousness.

However Jill herself may have an obvious and consistent preference, and I’m not sure anyone fundamentally knows the reason for that, other than Jill thinks wine tastes better.

Yeah I don’t get the title. How is pleading “Not Guilty”, which is what we expected, a wild defense?

It’s so completely wild and backwards. Imagine your not a reddit user, but a search leads you to a reddit link, and you’re on your phone. You see all this stuff about downloading the app instead, and you’re just going to bail, never reading the post. If there was no friction, they may have converted a new user.

They act like everyone already uses reddit and the users are so addicted they’ll put up with anything.

Ignoring my general problems with Meta, I find Instagram very clunky in general. Pass.

I’ve always been a fan of destruction and general environment interactability in games. Imagine what Red Faction Guerilla could be on modern hardware.

The shadow cabal that ran Reddit

Now I’m nostalgic for the YouTube parties of old…