So is toast.

I’ll stop saying it if it stops being true.

False. Porn is sexy, and I can’t possibly be aroused by an image of a woman spreading her cheeks when her fingers are attached to her arse with a continuous piece of flesh, giving her skin the same topography as a teapot.

Funny. Every time someone points out how god awful AI is, someone else comes along to say “It’s just a tool, and it’s good if someone can use it properly.” But nobody who uses it treats it like “just a tool.” They think it’s a workman they can claim the credit for, as if a hammer could replace the carpenter.

Plus, the only people good enough to fix the problems caused by this “tool” don’t need to use it in the first place.

I have thought about this in embarrassing depth.

The first reason I can think of is when sex isn’t an option. Maybe you’re in a long distance relationship or something. It gives a good structure to what is essentially phone sex.

The second reason is as a form of foreplay. We already have sexy roleplay in the sheets to help set the mood, and now we’re just using character sheets instead of bed sheets. Then your “what would you like to do” can be followed by a demonstration.

This is why I think sexy RPGs should be designed for couples.

There’s another all-time-worst game called Racial Holy War, which is exactly what you’d assume from the title. And yes, it’s incompetently made to the point where they didn’t include mechanics for ATTACKING.

R

U

Looks good. Approve

Just a technicallity, but Sam Says almost entirely consists of docking points.

Check the bonus panel

But being on a wall is not a part of the painting. The banana is only art because it’s on a wall. If the art is “banana taped to a wall”, does removing the banana from the wall stop the banana from being art?

The article is from November 2024, so yes, it DID happen months ago.

If he tapes two bananas to the wall at the same time, is that art forgery?

Since the artwork is the banana taped to a wall, does it stop being artwork as soon as it’s taken down? If so, has he actually eaten art, or just destroyed art and eaten a banana?

Can you take two artworks, mash them up, and turn them into artwork bread?

These are just a few of the interesting questions that a crypto-bro just trying to shake his “I’m rich” dick around lacks the intellectual capacity to think about.

I was once GMing for that same bestie in a 3d6-based system. I told her to roll, then realised her stats weren’t high enough for her to succeed, so told her not to. She gave me a look, picked up the dice, and rolled a crit. Out of SPITE. And this is 3d6, so it’s a 1 in 216 chance.

She didn’t need to manipulate me. Either I went along with it, or my dice would be forever cursed.

My bestie had a character who only had a +1 in Charisma, but this was the highest in the party, so she became the party face. And she never rolled lower than 19 total when making Charisma checks for that character. The dice clearly had plans.

Granted. You become a djinni, trapped in a lamp and a slave to the wishes of others. Oh, did you want to grant your own wishes? Tough luck.

Most tools aren’t actively detrimental to use, though. It’s like a hammer where the handle is covered in spikes. Even if you’re a genius and know how to hold it without cutting your hand, most people would just use a different hammer. And I’m not going to let that toolsmith off the hook, either.

It’s fun when a character within a story says exactly what the audience has been saying.

Well, they fixed one problem, but now there’s another.

Edit: There we go!