• 2 Posts
  • 887 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2024

help-circle




  • I was under the impression that Disney had significant creative control over the development of the most recent seasons, but I could be wrong. I guess I was just thrown off by the fact that every ad for the latest season I’ve seen has a Disney logo on it, and I assumed it went the way of so many American shows and franchises Disney has engulfed.








  • There are advantages to getting server-grade hardware. It’s designed to run 24/7, often supports more hard drives, ram sticks, processors, etc, and often is designed to make it very quick to replace things when they break.

    You can find used servers on sites like EBay for reasonable prices. They typically come from businesses selling their old hardware after an upgrade.

    However, for simple home use cases, an old regular desktop PC will be just fine. Run it until it breaks!


  • WolfLinktoScience Memes@mander.xyzIs there a way out?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    A lot of this is kinda already happening.

    Score could be kept with citations.

    This is already something people brag about / look at as a measure of success. There are plenty of free websites to keep track but the most popular one is Google Scholar.

    Perhaps competing labs could both receive citation credit if their results essentially showed the same thing.

    When I find multiple good papers that have the information I need, I cite all of them, and even feel happy about it because citing a lot of papers can make your paper look like you put in more work.

    If nobody could scoop anyone else’s work, then cooperation may be encouraged over competition.

    It’s a bit hard to completely do away with scooping. A possibly more practical way to increase cooperation would be to eliminate the idea of the “first author” getting the majority of the credit. It’s really annoying when like 5 people heavily contributed to the paper but whoever’s name is listed first ends up getting 90% of the credit because that’s what people look for.

    The idea of doing things in a wiki format is interesting though.




  • Things like lectures I agree are actually better online than in person, but there’s a lot about university learning that can’t really be replicated online.

    The most obvious thing being physical demonstrations and hands on projects, which I had in several physics and engineering classes.

    Also I think in-person works better for discussion sections or office hours, where talking it out and writing it on a board is often easier to do in person than online (although there are tools for these things online).

    Another big thing you’d miss out on by studying online is the whole social aspect of living away from your parents and with other people your age and making friends and going to parties and such.