Is the backside of a portal transparent? I thought it might connect to the backside of the other portal…

They should probably try to fix the issues that caused the population to vote for him.

It never about “fixing” or “killing” individuals, but about systems that do not work for some people.

Trumps administration will likely start out with a lot of power hungry egomaniac freaks, and then with its very high turnover, trump loyalists will be filtered through, like they did in their first term.

Competence doesn’t really matter.

Konservativ ist die Zukunft und Veränderungen auszublenden.

NixOS would be like brewing coffee with laboratory equipment and then setting it up for automation.

From the two unsuccessful ban trials of the NPD, I do not have much hope of this one succeeding. Sadly.

Ich hoffe auf keine gesetzliche Grenze, lass die Ärzte entscheiden wehn man wie am besten retten kann im Fall einer probematischen Geburt.

Wenn sich Ärtzte jetzt strafbar machen könnten, wenn sie in bestimmter weise eingreifen, dann weigern diese sich vielleicht komplett.

deleted by creator

Well, in that way it is a classic open source software, very powerful but a bit difficult to use.

I rather have features I need hidden behind a cryptic interface, then not have them.

I also normally carry around a power bank, and sometimes have to recharge my phone at lunch, when using it intensively. That seems just normal to me at this point.

I prefer OSMand over Organic Maps, because it has much more features, just the map renderer isn’t as pretty.

But I mostly use it for pedestrian and bike navigation. But I think car navigation works very well as well.

Also, if the map data isn’t so great in your region, you can try playing StreetComplete and help improve it yourself.

OSM is the Wikipedia of map data, and offers likely the most detailed map that we have.

A lot of this is a game of probabilities, which I don’t really think we have.

For instance if a normal human driver, without any automation, can prevent 80% of dangerous situations, but the automation can only prevent 50%, and in those situations the human savety driver can prevent only another 50%, because of inattention, this results in just 75% of dangerous situations prevented and the automation is worse.

Maybe someone knows the real probabilities, I don’t.

What does my comment have to do with me?

i just say what normally happens, and is happening to some degree in certain parts of the left. They often overly generally blame “men” for everything, forgetting that they also are victims in the same system. And that everyone should work together to continuously improve the system.

The leftist critique should always be directed to how to improve the system for everyone, not directed against certain individuals or groups. If they put blame onto certain groups of people, they are right-wing. Because this is how the right thinks. Individuals or groups of people are always at fault for the right.

Nobody is born evil, we need to understand why people do certain things we do not like them to do. For instance people are conservative, often because they are afraid of things. Maybe men currently might struggle to find their place in the modern world, then left needs to acknowledge that and try to improve the system, so that they do not need to have that fear anymore. Sure, maybe other injustices in the system are more important, but do not complain if affected people become upset, and do not behave like you wanted them to.

You know, critiquing and improving the system.

If the goal here is to punish “men” until they behave, this will just cause them to be more angry at the perceived injustice and move more to the right.

Exactly, stuff like this will just drive more people to the extreme right. Great job…

And the company owners do not walk or have to deal with customers.

I get the sentiment, but in this time and age and with the internet, I think the information most likely to be at risk of being destroyed or censored is the one that is not commonly available, or in the hands of law enforcement.

A fascist government will more likely effectively prevent creation of new dissenting works, than suppressing existing ones.

One notable software business professional interviewed by RBC thought that the West’s decision would “adversely affect the life of the developer community, mutual trust within it, and therefore the quality of the product.”

It was Russia and other autocracies etc. that diminished the trust by actually financing developers for multiple years to first earn trust and finally introduce backdoors into open source software, as demonstrated by the XZ utils backdoor.

In open source projects, maintainers need to have some initial trust into each contributor, and let this trust naturally grow with time and contributions. They cannot perform intensive background checks on everyone before accepting a patch.

While it is easier to uncover backdoors in open source software, there is no good way to defend and prevent against this kind of attack in this type of development process. All open source projects can do is trying to take away some trust from people within higher risk groups. This of course might lead to discrimination.

My shower thought since I watched Star Trek: In a world where universal translators are ubiquitous, do babies even need to learn any common language, or do they each develop individual languages and let the UT handle the rest?

UT translating baby noises into articulate language, should have been in an episode.

Nothing gets burned or otherwise destroyed when receiving EM radiation via a dish and converted it into electricity via a receiver.

Sure, the amplification stage of the process likely works only one way, and should be replaced in order to send something.

The one way process of burning oil to generate heat seems much more primitive than the energy conversion offered by a diode, TBH.

You can push or tow an electric car and charge their batteries. Because electric motors are also generators.

Even with your simplistic fossil fuel car in your example the alternator within can also be used as a motor.

I have nothing against any meta search engine, they are very useful, and I use them primarily as well.

However, they are not a true alternative, because they depend on third-party services. The same as Invidious is a very useful, but also not an alternative to YouTube itself, just a different user interface.

The best “server-side” anti cheat mechanisms online is streaming the game, and I am sure that eventually some talented developers are able to even write some aim bot (or more) for that.

Competitive games need a fully controlled environment. Doing it online with random unknown people should not be taken as serious as they currently do.

Alot about video games is not standardized. To be competitive all players should have the same hardware, internet connection, etc. So that it is actually individual skill that is measured, not just the size of players wallet.

But even then, developing skill takes alot of practice and time, which also, in our current system, can be converted into money. There just is no fair competition here anyway. Still many people believe in meritocracies…