Right, on shared branch you might need to pull first if you’re out of date (and you would be if you’re all leaving the office at the same time), and that could cause a merge conflict.
It’s like I always said, bad branching strategies are a fire safety issue.
On a push? What are you merging there?
That lack of communication along with a ban is a pretty important difference, thanks for highlighting it. Maybe the mod could also send a message to the user with the context of the ban, but they have to do it manually.
I appreciate your light touch on moderation, though I think you might want to have really basic rules e.g. no CP, to protect yourself as the apparent owner of the site.
Based on the only recently removed user and their visible posts I’d say it’s fair to call it not suitable for the community and also that they had a raw deal - should have been given a warning or something before the ban. I’d be happy to see content like that but likely would need a dedicated community for spicy memes.
I definitely think the community should call out the limits.
Thanks for sharing the mod log and your views!
Yeah, not sure why it feels the need to mimic the appearance of social media when replaying an old joke. Does it make it appear more spontaneous?
Most honey wouldn’t be vegan but perhaps an abandoned hive could be harvested. Or infertile eggs from an abandoned nest? Bits of sheep’s wool collected from a spiky bush?
You’ve forgotten the sauce and haven’t toasted the bread, 4/10
It would probably taste alright and is reasonably nutritious, but it’s not right.
Do you know a Lemmy app which actually lets you preview links before opening them? I’d like to test my suspicions sometimes but don’t have the option.
Why are you hating on poor people? Do you think punching down makes good comedy?
And yet very few people actually get to launch nukes these days. One rule for them and another for us.
It’s all human readable abstractions for 0s and 1s, isn’t it? Unless you’re working with quantum computers.
We want to draw the line somewhere, so my mum on FB doesn’t call herself a programmer for creating a post, but it’s not very clear where to put that line. I think it has to depend on the context, you could tell your hairdresser you’re a programmer to avoid the unnecessary details, but wouldn’t describe it as such in a job interview.
Even this isn’t exactly correct - that would allow you to cast reaction spells on your turn, but the rules do not.
When you cast a leveled spell using a bonus action, the only other spells you can cast on that turn is a cantrip, with your action.
The difference is you can’t cast more leveled spells at all, and you can’t cast any spells including cantrips if they don’t use an action. That last part doesn’t usually matter, unless you have multiple bonus actions, or reaction cantrips (which appeared in the playtest of next edition).
Edited to reduce misinformation, left the wrong in place so corrections make sense
I’d like to assume the compliance plan involves that - or at least moving it to a safer orbit - but it’s probably more likely the plan is just saying “we won’t do it again”.
You got me. I’ll try harder.
Yeah they’re trying to sell us the idea that things are magical and wonderful instead of the most squeezed we’ve ever been.
Not that person, but the update is really good.
Throwing weapons are decent to use now (they were awful when they were added). I like the new skill tree and while I’m feeling a bit constrained by the cyberware limits I can see how it would make me feel much more powerful if I built towards it, instead of just having ED and SC limits I can easily exceed.
I lost pretty quickly on my first attempt, but I’m feeling confident about my second run! I’d let you know how it gets on, but…
I’ll believe it when they execute one
If they’re stealing it from people, I think I’d do something. But corporations aren’t people.
It’s supposed to be in the game but in the main menu instead of the pause menu. They’ve had main menu popups for dlc for years, not sure if I’ve seen ads for other games before.