falkerie71

  • 8 Posts
  • 469 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle
  • falkerie71toWikipedia@lemmy.worldTiger Balm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I find it mildly funny that people in my home country (TW) rave about China-Oel and buy loads of it when they travel to Germany, while people there probably have never even heard of it, and prefer using Tiger Balm which is super common in Asia.



  • Thanks. I also asked around my friend group, and they have said similar things. There’s not a lot you can do concerning color reproduction across devices, they sometimes even edit two versions, one for PC/storage, one for phone/social media. Other than that, it’s a lost cause.

    So I guess the problem now boils down to color consistency in the same device across programs. Particularly on PC. I know that having a calibrated monitor is one major step, but what settings to tick and color space conversions in various programs are what’s bothering me. Like, one photo imported from my phone can look desaturated in one program, over saturated in the other, and have a different blue tone in a third. Which version should I edit in? I’m only sticking to shooting in sRGB mode on my camera now to minimize headaches, but just wondering what else I could do.





  • Not necessarily hate, but did not like as much as the rest of the internet: Oppenheimer

    The moment I left the theater, I thought it should have been longer. Yes, I think an already 3hr film should be even longer. Just torture the audience at this point. But I thought that there was just so much stuff to cram into that 3hr length, there was not enough room for the story to breath, even if those stories were needed to paint a better picture of Oppenheimer’s life, morals, and conflicts.

    I’d still recommend it to people. If anything, it’s still a visually well directed film. But if you aren’t a physics/history buff, you might not enjoy the story as much.

    In my opinion, a better history based movie would be The Imitation Game. Much more focused story, even if some aren’t historically accurate.




  • Outstanding visual is pretty packed this year, but I wish Nine Sols wins it. It’s not even underrated, just feels like it wasn’t talked much about outside of Hollow Knight enjoyers, maybe due to it launching on PC only (console version came out only recently), or perhaps due to the studio’s turbulent past. More people should really give it a go.






  • Cause physics. F-number is calculated by (focus length / diameter of entrance pupil). Say you want a 400mm focal length with max f2.8, your front element diameter would need to be 400/2.8 = 143mm. Looking at the Canon EF 200mm F2.8, which has a filter diameter of 72mm, 200/2.8 = 72. Math checks out.
    (Edit: Front element diameter is not actually equal to entrance pupil diameter, but here let’s just say it is. You can look up the physics if you’re interested.)

    Have you actually looked up the lenses yourself? Canon EF 400mm f2.8 lens exist, but you’re looking at 10x your budget brand new, and really huge sizes. And if you want zoom on top of that? Just search the Sigma 200-500mm f/2.8, aka the “Bigma”. I’d say you’re better off using f4 lenses or whatever is within your budget, and try to work within the limits.

    TLDR: If you want telephoto with super wide aperture, the lens would need to be massive, and expensive.


  • I’m going against the grain and say that pretty much any modern camera can fill your needs, small or big. You say you don’t mind packing larger gear, but for travel specifically, you will feel every extra weight.

    First, going with modern mirorrless cameras instead of DSLRs will save a huge chunk of volume and weight out of the gate. Though you would be paying a bit extra for modern stuff.
    Second, if you’re mostly going to shoot in daylight, going with smaller sensor sizes (APS-C or M43 instead of Full Frame) also cuts down weight for the camera body and lenses. If you’re really worried about low light photos, then go Full Frame (but I’d say APS-C sensors are still mostly fine).

    There is no right way of learning all the ins and outs of photography settings (ISO, shutter speed, F-stop). Digital cameras already make taking photos so much easier, you can learn all those stuff at your own pace. I’d say stop worrying and just go out and shoot. Get a camera that at least has a PASM dial. If you’re not sure about what settings for what scenario, put it to Auto/P-mode. Then, you can try out A-mode and S-mode when you need it. Look up stuff when you don’t understand a thing, or want to replicate a certain feel. Take more photos, and learn composition along the way. Sometimes composition is more important to a good photo than the right settings.

    Hope this helps!