• 21 Posts
  • 11K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: 20 June 2023

help-circle





  • I mean, nominally, they don’t; it’s a legacy of the Cold War. But instead of drawing things down after the USSR fell, Russia held on to thousands and thousands of them, and the US felt it would be irresponsible to allow such a clear imbalance of power with a recent foe… that turned into a current foe. And China, being a neighbor of Russia, and also now a pretty clear adversary of the US, wasn’t about to let themselves get outpaced by strategic rivals either.

    There was an opportunity in the 90s to just calm things down a ton, but that came and went.

    TL;DR: a sound modern nuclear policy for a reasonably wealthy country is to have a reasonable enough number of weapons deployable via at least two vectors (one as sub-launched, if possible) to serve as a credible and ironclad second-strike force. That is the backstop that’ll keep your borders and sovereignty safe in the long run.



  • The problem that’s arising now is that all of the major nuclear powers (UK and France aren’t really “major”) are now run by authoritarian regimes. The obvious implication is that there’s a sharply increased risk that they’ll decide to start using nukes to get what they want, and that they’ll all be more or less on the same side.

    The rest of the world DOES need to seriously start exploring nuclear arms programs. The complete and total abrogation of the Budapest Memorandum (flagrantly by Russia via invasion; passively by the US and UK for not doing much of anything in response to Russia invading in 2014, and not providing more direct and overt support in 2022) has laid bare that the security agreements therein were worth less than the paper it was signed on.

    Our failure to do ANYTHING meaningful to defend Ukraine when they gave up thousands of Soviet nukes in the wake of the fall of the USSR has made it painfully clear that nuclear proliferation is coming back in a big way, by simple virtue of the fact that they are clearly the final word in terms of guaranteeing a country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

    Russia would absolutely not have invaded Ukraine if one of the possible consequences was “Moscow and St Petersburg get turned to glass”.




  • When and where exactly did she support genocide…? Cite your sources.

    I’m appalled and aghast at what Israel is doing in Gaza. But as far as I’m aware, she’s been a staunch critic of Israel in this matter, not a supporter. And I have receipts for that. She’s literally been targeted by smear campaigns by other members of the Democratic party, over her stance of condemning Israel’s actions in Gaza, and not just from members of the establishment/gerontocracy.

    If you’re trying to use her immediate contemporaneous response to the attack, on the day of the attack (which I believe essentially every single politician in the country also condemned), as the pivotal evidence that she “supports” genocide: you’re obviously arguing in bad faith.









  • Yep, exactly.

    I remember the double-return of the first F9H boosters (that one-two sonic boom 🤯) and watching them land side-by-side. I remember watching the successive starship iterations get closer and closer to landing, then iterate on the reentry effort, and watching plasma partially eat through one of the stabilizers without fully wrecking it on a fucking livestream. THAT was wild. And it was the most excited I’ve been about science and engineering I’ve been in a long time.

    And now I simply cannot separate the fact that the company is owned and run by the guy who did a seig heil to the fascist authoritarian when he took office, and who is now actively helping tear apart the very institutions that set SpaceX up for success - amongst fucking everything else in this country that has ever given us a competitive advantage. It’s heartbreaking and deeply infuriating.