Because this data literally doesn’t include trans, Queer, two spirit, asexual, or any other sexuality besides the ones in the acronym. It is only that acronym because of the data, it’s a coincidence not an intention.
Because this data literally doesn’t include trans, Queer, two spirit, asexual, or any other sexuality besides the ones in the acronym. It is only that acronym because of the data, it’s a coincidence not an intention.
Not necessarily, just because you never ordered it doesn’t mean it’s not a potential recommendation. Actually it may be more likely they will recommend things you haven’t ordered before as the system is trying to get you to potentially have more diversity of products. Even in the example above, yeah a dip looks stupid from just the recommendations, but what if the thing being ordered is bread sticks or wings, then it’s normal.
Recommendation systems are Machine Learning, so if you are ever recommend a product in a modern application it’s almost always an ML model.
A recent example is Owlcat’s Rouge Trader. Full game on release, season pass is just a bundle of their two big expansion DLCs which offer full story additions and party members. Season passes work when they are lower cost bundles of high quality DLC, they are awful when they are incoherent slapped together offerings of cosmetics, random content, and stuff which should be base game.
The original comics has the great depression there instead of Anarco Syndicalism
Drag’s right on this one lads, sad but true
The way Drag speaks is the trend, we are all just following
Protect Drag at all cost
In what world is it acceptable military doctrine to kill the entire family of enemy combatants? If that was the case with Israeli soldiers you’d be able to extrapolate a justifiable strike to include almost the entire population as almost all citizens have done military service. Take a minute to actually soak in what you just said.
roboute guilliman enters the chat
I do not understand why anyone in the modern day refers to Jung or Freud or any other pre-empirical psychologist in the modern day in any context other than historical. Their ideas were not theories, just unfalsifiable ideas. We are past that by a long shot, just let it die already for fucks sake.
My LinkedIn feed is actually mostly people outranged by it and they are mostly people who are very pro AI typically. A lot of people get frustrated at LinkedIn especially because they don’t provide anything to creators and make all their money off of them.
Yeah I agree this isn’t even a meme at all, I get Lemmy is a very political group of people but it’s honestly absurd how people post things everywhere without consideration of the theme
Knowing this it seems like a very low quality study. They should probably redo this with multiple conditions.
If you make enough mistakes, speed is a detriment not a benefit. Increasing speed allows you to produce more summaries but if you still need to correct and edit them all you’ve done is add a step where a human has to still read the document to the level where they could summarize it and edit the AI summary. Therefore the bottleneck of a human reading the document and working on a summary is still there. It would only potentially make it slightly easier if the corrections needed are small and obvious.
Please go outside, I beg of you
My most used book is my copy of Dungeon World but my most used accessory is definitely my notebook, filled with session notes, sketches, and stories. Ah the thrills of the forever GM.