Why do many when few
Why do many when few
Well, bash.org is gone, so…
There’s ample evidence that both teleprompters were unharmed after the shooting. I don’t really care whether or not he was hit by a bullet or some shrapnel, but asserting that it was from the teleprompters just isn’t factual.
I’d definitely notice a missing shoe though.
I know a lot of people who assumed she would win and later claimed their lack of voting is because of incorrect polls. Very frustrating to hear.
Why not just buy a TV and not connect it to the internet?
Yeah, my wife and I didn’t inherit any money or get any kind of gift for a down payment but we wouldn’t be homeowners unless our parents paid tens of thousands into each of our college educations.
They are some of the weirdest people, but they don’t realize it. That’s why it’s effective. They think they’re the normal true real America, and everyone else is weird.
Your reply didn’t cite a policy position he has after being asked which policy you disagree with.
A rattlesnake can certainly communicate using sound, but is that language? Bright colors can communicate ideas of “do not eat this” across species as well, but they wouldn’t fit my mental model of a language.
“What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject’s rifle,” the agency said in a statement.
They’re saying it could have been a fragment of a bullet, which would qualify as shrapnel. They’re not using that word.
Souza deleted his own account.
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/4798519-former-white-house-photographer-deletes-x-account/
I think someone is standing under the rear hatch of their car. You can see the bottom of the hatch and the rear window.
It should work with the latest Nvidia driver. It does for me.
Also only one of these guys is running for president.
Like, let’s say John Stewart did everything he’s saying Trump did. Okay, cool, I won’t vote for him to be president either.
I used to play StarCraft II in Wine back in like 2010.
I’m really not following your reasoning in this thread. Are you arguing that we would have a way to securely transfer nude images to another individual and prevent them from distributing that image if such a technology created value for shareholders? And we can’t do that because it doesn’t?
In my house it was running the vacuum. TV became unusable.
I agree with what you’re saying but I’m curious. You have to pay taxes on the value of your car? Do car registration fees scale with car value in your area?
This has never been proven in any way. It would be really easy to show that a smart TV will automatically connect to an open WiFi connection and send data, but nobody has done it.