Something… something… freedom.

Nope. I’ve talked about implementing it. I posted on bboard for info on the site’s code. Therd was some interest in the feature, but no one was able to point me at the code.

I heard the owner on the radio today. Seems like a cool human.

Really cool idea. I am thr type that likes a confortable rut, and I need more listening practice.

No one who’s seen a few immigration hearings in the US holds any illusions that the US is upholding its international obligation to accept asylum seekers.

Real “out-of-touch gentry telling starving folk to eat cake” vibes.

Great piece!

Played the shit out of this in High School.

I liked this episode of Live like the World is Dying: https://www.liveliketheworldisdying.com/s1e35-casandra-on-food-preserveration/

It does a decent job introducing canning, drying and fermentation.

Well, it’s not enough, but it’s better than nothing. I hope we see more of this in the future.

That’s when we get eminent domain’d by the US.

Very cool! I wish it showed London.

Wonderful!

deleted by creator

Rest in Piss.

I have heard this too, with the added (and unverified) statement that kbin.social is behind Cloudflare right now, which is breaking federation.

I subscribe to the podcast on Android via the PocketCasts app. You can search for the podcast by name in the “discover” panel. Then you can browse and listen to more easily.

I have also experienced this.

Land back!

There’s also the error bars.

Scientists will determine that the temperature will rise by between 1°C and 6°C. That’s a big range. Climate change is complicated and it’s impossible to account for all of the variables.

To the scientist (and their colleagues) they’ll know that 3°C is most likely, and this type of paper reads like a dire warning… but when the news breaks, it goes. One of two ways:

1. “1-6°C is a huge range, scientists must not know what’s going on. What does this even mean?”

2. “Scientists report that temperature will rise by at least 1°C, the UN Council on Blah Blah says that we should keep under 1.5°C…”

It’s maddening, really. Most of the scientists I know are doomers.

I’d frame it along the lines of: Scientists only talk about what they can prove.

This standard is higher than the opposition, which will publish “shower thoughts” as “evidence”.

If you talk to scientists (off the record) about what they think is likely the case, that’s where you get more dire commentary. They’ve been trained to hold back, nothing nefarious… but also not helpful in the current media climate.