Knowledge can be a status symbol like clothing. People show what they know if they can signal their status with it.

In that form, knowledge is not verified by own thoughts. The value of the knowledge comes from the reputation of the source and the value of the people who agree with it.

So far, what do you think ADHD is?

Who would be interested in creating a freedom company? This looks like an opportunity to me. There must be an arrangement where people work together to acquire the necessary resources without feeling forced.

The hate is always there, it’s just not provoked.

With cars, there is no space. Other people are close. Traffic shows us how we feel when our expectations are not fulfilled.

Nobody needs customers. People need resources and are willing to serve customers in exchange.

What has Europe to offer that China needs? We had advanced technologies, but China is quickly surpassing everything.

Mostly true. It’s just very difficult to make a lot of money in a fully moral way so a lot of people are not entirely wrong.

Nach h. M. kann auch bereits die Mitgliedschaft in einer verfassungsfeindlichen Organisation Zweifel an der Verfassungstreue begründen.

https://www.rechtslexikon.net/d/verfassungstreue/verfassungstreue.htm

Gesichert rechtsextrem ist aber nicht verfassungsfeindlich. Bei der Einstufung geht es nur um den Umfang der Überwachung.

Es gilt sogar

aber allein die Mitgliedschaft in einer verfassungsfeindlichen Organisation für eine Ablehnung nicht ausreichend sein läßt, sondern eine Prüfung jedes Einzelfalles verlangt

Damit gilt das Gegenteil, selbst ein AfD Verbot reicht nicht.

Die Tagesschau vermeidet leider eine genaue Analyse der Rechtslage.

Rein rechtlich gesehen kann es doch nicht unklar sein. Solange die AfD nicht verboten ist müssen Konsequenzen illegale Diskriminierung sein. Nach einem Verbot sind Konsequenzen Pflicht. Korrekt wäre dann, wenn dies nur für Menschen gilt, die sich weiter engagieren. Gesetze dürfen nicht rückwirkend etwas bestrafen das legal war.

That door is locked.

The cartoon is apt. It’s even worse. Pilots don’t fly without the approval of airline management.

The door to the cockpit is locked. If there has been a discussion or if there is just this vote, the powerlessness of those regular passengers shows that anti-intellectualism is an isolated problem. It only looks dangerous to those who don’t remember the locked door.

Could be. What I wanted to say is that the sample size is bigger than two if the community cannot come up with successful bootstrapping stories.

How should a secret society remove such a video without silencing the author?

https://xkcd.com/1425/

It is easier to do the above three things. Removing a video draws attention to it because the author will post it on other channels. Other people will upload it to check the claim that it is removed.

It’s much easier to drown a problematic video in other content so that only few people discover it. So some people know the real truth, but nobody believes them or cares about them.

I don’t have better proof. For me it was enough because I also read the comments and there don’t seem to be many success stories.

There is only one choice: feeling or rationality.

When you feel, you do what feels best.

When you think, you do what is the most valuable.

So no free will but that choice.

It’s enough to show that escaping poverty is not trivial.

Check the YT videos of people who said the same and voluntarily tried to escape a life at the bottom. It’s a comforting illusion that one could hustle onself back into ‘normal’ life. I have seen two attempts, and both gave up.

I am sorry. It was meant as a dark joke but totally flopped.

The link is still helpful. There is not much room for improvement if the current situation is good enough for most people.

Now you know why redistribution won’t happpen. The fucking tankies won’t be happy with limiting redistribution to the nation. They don’t want national, they want international socialism.

In that scenario, it’s better to keep going as before. Whatever people have now, the ones who can implement the change have more than 55,412 USD.

Tankies even have a word for it, if workers earn more than the average: Labor aristocracy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_aristocracy

Can ADHD be almost the right way to handle undesired work?

If one doesn’t want to do work, it’s straight forward to not do it. If that isn’t allowed then doing everything else is the closest thing to avoiding that work. In that sense, ADHD is either a way of avoiding to be broken or the inability to integrate work into one’s accepted goals.

How could it be possible to accept work that one doesn’t want to do?

er und seine freunde.

Können wir mal eine Liste seiner Freunde machen? Sie sind ja die Ursache des Problems. Dann sollten wir auch wissen, was sie wollen.