• 41 Posts
  • 3 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 12th, 2022

help-circle
  • You’ve done nothing wrong. If the children thing could find any brain space, it was because liberals were “tolerating” trans people. If instead they really felt and understood gender as a social construct and a way to express oneself, and relate to others (or whatever your transfeminist definition of gender is), then there’s no way to go “too far” by teaching that to children, or just showing the diversity that develops out of it. “You’ve gone too far” sounds something that a zookeeper says to a jailed monkey who many smiled to when jailed, but became angry and upset when the monkey wanted to go out through the bars and be treated equally.

    My point is: a shallow opinion for support, can become a shallow opinion against, in a short time. Gotta keep fighting.








  • Just, this. Haven’t anyone risen the point that in boxing there is segregation by weight? And in some sports by age? Also, clearly, black people in general have genetic superiority in (i think) explosive force and inferiority in swimming because of muscle fiber density.

    However, wouldn’t segregate athletes by “race” be called racist? Why doing so by “sex” isn’t “sexist”?

    Why aren’t athletes segregate by testosterone levels, however way this should be measured? Or height? Or weight? Or foot length? Or age? Like, poor post-35 athletes, they can’t have a fair race against 20-somethings, they have a natural disadvantage. Or, I don’t know, just “marks”, and let compete people with similar marks together, and let’s see what people in different marks or categories have to offer. Anyone know whether if in boxing lighter fights are like faster or more agile than heavier?

    All this biologicist criteria of “poor women” is bullshit. Yes, where there is a clear T gap and this gives cis women a fair competition and representation, and it has value, but it is taken to the absurd like with chess, as it’s been already said.

    Outside of sports, the definition of a “biological women” is also racist and eurocentrist. Like, european cis-women tend to have more hair than east-asian men. And african/black women tend to muscle up way easier than white men. Also, height difference betwen “sexes” isn’t a thing in the Andes, it’s just not real. And taking andinian people, they may be shorter in height and may not run as fast as a whitie, but take that race to 4000 m above sea level and let’s see who can endure half a marathon and is “naturally superior”.

    I am really fed up by racist and patriarchal arguments trying to hide behind a science with overfunded biases.