Never thought I would live to see the day that what used to be a contemporary episode of Doctor Who would have to be viewed as if it was a time travel episode

That roundabout needs a speaker constantly playing Entry of the Gladiators on repeat

Oh thank God for the people working to make the horrors of history less horrible

Edit: oh shit, did I eat the onion? Imma feel bad about that downvote if I missed the implied /s

Thankfully you don’t have to choose! You could instead sit with the people eager to actively fight against racism instead of making up excuses to let thrive

“As an apolitical centrist, I think punching a member of the KKK is just as bad as the KKK lynching innocent people. Violence is always bad.”

If the German government turned Auschwitz into a hotel and resort for people to throw parties and get married and ignore the atrocities that happened there, I’d be in favor of burning it down

I am specifically advocating for this to be burnt down. These monsters gleefully ignore the torture and murder that went on here when the building was made. Imagine modern Germans throwing parties and getting married at Buchenwald. Imagine if Dachau’s website made no mention of the 40,000+ people murdered there.

Historical sites shouldn’t be preserved just because they’re old. They should be preserved with context, and when the context is taken away, the reason to preserve them is as well.

Were it an actual museum of sorts, I’d agree. This wasn’t a place people went to learn about the horrors of slavery, it was a fucking resort

Not all of us

You are correct, but implying something is not the same as literally stating something

Hated the jewelry one too

Only one I didn’t get. The parent hint threw me way off. Could not come up with a word that started with si- that had anything to do with it

I mean it wouldn’t be every social interaction. Not even a majority. Something like 2% of the population identifies as something other than their assigned gender at birth, and the majority of those are transgender individuals who make it very clear how they want to be referred to.

Understand that these people will continue to have the same gender identity whether you understand it or not. The alternative to apologizing to people when you misgender them is… not apologizing for it.

Sure, but I’m not gonna claim it’s equivalent until I start getting harassed regularly about my body

Like, until men have to deal with this shit, I’m happy to listen when women complain about men. Like one guy said, it’s not all men, but it’s too damn many

Personally I’ve never been offended because I know I ain’t the men they’re talking about

So you’re saying we could cut violent crime by roughly 80% if we were rid of men? Neat

It’s not necessarily a social faux pas to misgender someone, that’s a myth made up by conservatives. It’s a faux pas to intentionally misgender people.

Sorta like if you call someone Jeb and they correct you and say it’s Jed. It only becomes an issue if you insist on calling them Jeb.

The axe thing could legit be cool, if the logo didn’t look like dog shit to accommodate it

Just take the original logo and add some edges to the wings. Am I dumb, or does this look infinitely better than that stupid spiky rectangle? I’m sure someone else can do it better job, I did the best I could on my phone

More reasonably, “wet” is often used as an adjective describing something that is liquid. Wet paint is, of course, wet.

How is that a counter source? It’s just another definition of the word. Words can mean multiple things.

No, and it takes a profound level of disingenuousness to bring the argument to this point. You must understand that the meanings of words are socially constructed, not aspects of physical reality. Usage is literally what determines the definitions of words.