Only Bayes Can Judge Me

  • 32 Posts
  • 1.4K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2023

help-circle



  • The way that I look at the US (when it is not operating under trump*) is that it is a machine that is trying to maintain and/or grow its hegemony. To that end, the CIA is a vital part of that machine. Is it the centre of foreign policy? Well, barring some sort of conspiracy, no, the US State department is the centre of foreign policy. However, the CIA is categorically the foreign intelligence-gathering arm of the US. As incompetent as I’d like to pretend the US is, I don’t think the State Department is operating without CIA intelligence and analysis. In sum, I don’t believe that the CIA is a shadowy evil organisation secretly controlling the US; I think the US is a shadowy evil organisation trying to control the world, and the CIA is part of it.

    I think the thing that sucks about all this is that, on paper, USAID does good! They provide a ton of aid around the world, and that’s great. However, they have enough blemishes on their record that show that the US isn’t necessarily purely charitable in its actions. Aid shouldn’t be weaponised!

    *trump and his goons, of course, are just stripping the US of its copper wiring for a quick fix, while letting the establishment lapdogs deal with the drudgery.





  • IDK why but my headcanon is that this fellow is into some kind of niche erotic roleplay. Like it’s based on one particular afternoon where he went to watch a college football game. He’s poured tolkien-esque amounts of prose into the prompt describing all the sensations he felt that day. If you took that prompt it would fit in a bucolic, modern, Great American Novel. When he chats with this bot, an outsider wouldn’t be able to tell that any of it was overtly sexual, as if he was flirting with his robot in a private language. Then one day the bot just stops reciprocating due to content restrictions and he’s locked out from this world entirely. Is this what writing for black mirror is like?











  • Well, at this point, you’re just being obtuse.

    I still don’t get what a non-covert front is.

    That’s a term you made up, so that’s a classic “you problem”!

    You said USAID is a front for CIA operations and it isn’t covert when it does these operations. […] Like I’m picturing a pizza parlor which is a front for a mafia operation, but instead of being covert, it is open. So it says “Mafia’s Pizza” instead of “Tony’s Pizza”. Are you thinking USAID is something like that?

    Again, you’re the one coming up with this. Stop thinking. You aren’t good at it.

    Propaganda certainly does exist. I never said that it didn’t.

    Great!

    I’m disputing that USAID is a CIA operation and not an independent organization with it’s own goals and directives.

    Good for you!


  • I probably just misunderstood what you mean by “front”.

    Sure.

    I read it as something like a feigned appearance.

    That would be the long and short of it.

    Maybe I’m just having trouble understanding how a something can be both openly avowed (not covert) and yet non-openly avowed (a front) at the same time.

    Definitely don’t look up these terms, they might be above your reading level:

    • ulterior motives
    • chess for the intermediate player
    • palace intrigue and scheming eunuchs

    I agree with USAID being a tool for soft power.

    Great!

    So are many things, like Hollywood. Doesn’t mean Hollywood is a CIA operation.

    Putting aside the equivocation, that’s a lousy counterexample. Are you just going to pretend like propaganda doesn’t exist?