• 5 Posts
  • 17 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle


  • Yes I agree. I think it will be earth first simply due to technology. As an example, capturing carbon right out of the atmosphere is a technology we have now.

    The downside is it’s very power intensive, but it often happens in some countries that there are more power generation than needed from renewables. And if we figure out fusion power then we clean electricity for milennia.

    So cleaning up earth will have to happen within the coming 100 years. Maybe in that timeframe we will have a permanent base in mars under a dome or underground. But true terraforming of Mars is many centuries out I believe. Just my thoughts on the matter.


  • No, not really. Mars has a very weak magnetosphere, so you need shielding against radiation. Also there is no atmosphere and any atmosphere we put on mars will quickly (in a geological timescale) get blown away by the charged solar winds because there is no magnetic field. So it’s an immense task, and probably a few hundred years out before we have the technology.


  • themobyone@beehaw.orgtoScience@beehaw.orgShould we terraform Mars?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    @hedge, you’re asking if we should terraform Mars if we haven’t already cleaned up this this planet. It’s a good question but I don’t see a problem here.

    Let me borrow a quote from Isaac Arthur, youtuber and president of the National Space Society(in USA), and I’m paraphrasing him: If we have the technology to truly terraform Mars, then lot of that technology will already have been used to stabilize the climate on earth. It’s by orders of magnitude easier to “fix” Earth, than make Mars habitable to humans without the need for Domes, or spacesuits to breathe outside.

    So to continue the “cleanup” analogy, it’s like cleaning up the worst nuclear disaster (Chernobyl ) vs cleaning a few drops of water off your kitchen floor.






  • I hope x-post (should we call it that here?) is allowed. for some reason the formatting got messed up.

    While I do agree with him on many things, it’s not all up to one user, or 10. If 10 people with very different interest just stay in each community there there’s no content for anyone. I think any new ‘service’ need some time to take hold. Of course user gained is a win. But then again it’s not up to a single user

    Edit: added my opinoin





  • I’m new to daily driving Linux. I’ve dabbled with Linux for years, but never used it that much until I installed it on a new m.2 drive on my main PC. Been using Arch for a little over 1 month now.

    I can understand your tired of tinkering, I came from windows where I was tired of fighting the OS to do what I want. So in that regard I use the same “energy” but instead of fighting windows I’m learning and getting better and building and customizing my Linux install exactly how I like it.

    As for other suggestions I don’t mind macOS, but their hardware screams planned obsolescence. they charge obscene amounts for a few gigabytes extra of SSD. I checked just now and they charge 259euro in my country to go from 256GB to 512GB. And I bought 2TB Samsung 980 pro NVME m.2 drive for 120euro a month ago.

    Windows is probably the worst OS, but you can install software that rips out all the built in spyware. And you get keys around the web for cheap. This way you can keep your PC, and the next time you get a new PC you can buy one you are reasonably certain will work well on Linux.









  • I remember some years back on Reddit there a change to what the default subs were. Suddenly my reddit frontpage was full of /r/aww and a lot of incredibly low effort content. From then on it was necessary to show only subs I subscribe to. I like memes as much as the next person, but in moderation.

    I’m not worried and don’t see a big problem if there are some subreddits/communities with memes and low effort content.

    In the discussion of size. I subbed to the classicalmusic sub. Right now there is an equivalent in the fediverse I think but it’s quite dead. Just having one community for all types of music isn’t really appealing. I don’t want to go through 1000s of popmusic post to find two about classical. This example of mine with classicalmusic transfers well to other topic. I started using a distro of Linux on my computer and want to connect with others also using Linux. For all these niche interest size is important.

    Then as for joining. I won’t say it’s complicated to sign up, but there is an extra hurdle in a way with how it’s a lot to take in about how the fediverse is working. Many people will join, but it requires slightly more effort still than many other social places around the internet.