@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 3 months agoJust a little friendly compromise, what could go wrong?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square201fedilinkarrow-up1679arrow-down1100
arrow-up1579arrow-down1imageJust a little friendly compromise, what could go wrong?lemmy.world@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square201fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•3 months agoSurviving a gunshot does not mean that you were not shot in a place that could have been fatal. You’re literally describing Survivorship Bias
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-2•3 months agoYou were going to kill them regardless, why tf do you care if the other places you shoot them have a chance of fatality? Minimizing harm is all about reducing chances of undue death or suffering.
Surviving a gunshot does not mean that you were not shot in a place that could have been fatal. You’re literally describing Survivorship Bias
You were going to kill them regardless, why tf do you care if the other places you shoot them have a chance of fatality? Minimizing harm is all about reducing chances of undue death or suffering.