• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1372 months ago

    Seriously I’ve said it before if you’ve backed legislation found to be blatantly unconstitutional you should be removed from office.

          • NielsBohron
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I’d argue that those were two separate clauses and aren’t related.

            Bigots and billionaires don’t have to be a detriment to humanity

            They could do positive things for society

            My compost pile has plenty of room

            I have space in my yard to increase the amount of compost I produce.

            Those two clauses are separate statements, IMHO. A non sequitur, sure, but unrelated, nonetheless

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 months ago

      Until you get clowns like we have in the Supreme Court shooting down women’s healthcare rights and this too becomes weaponized against the Democrats because those rights are somehow “unconstitutional”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I say blatantly which would be different in legalese but basically, if it is directly without need for interpretation such as saying gay people cannot be teachers which is directly discriminating against sexual orientation, then you’re out. Meanwhile if it’s later found to be unconstitutional due to interpretation or implementation such as stop and frisk then you’re not removed, though any laws copying said law that was already found unconstitutional WOULD then cause you to be removed because duh we’ve been here before.

        Edit: also, only said outed from office and not banned as if it’s used to remove people they could still be voted back in with a special election or whatever, similar to what happened with jones/pearson being removed using bullshit.