• Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    252 months ago

    I’m sure the White House paid it extra special attention.

    So what exactly did they do this for?

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        272 months ago

        “I don’t have a home, but I’m not homeless!”

        Seems like a typical SovCit.

        • LanternEverywhere
          link
          fedilink
          332 months ago

          Sorry but he’s right on this one. A home isn’t just like a house. A mobile home is still a home. If the structure keeps you safe from the elements, contains some of your possessions, and is the place where you sleep usually, then that’s absolutely a home

          • prole
            link
            English
            152 months ago

            Yet conservatives salivate at the thought of literally destroying similar domiciles that happen to form an “encampment”. What’s the difference? Why does this guy deserve the dignity of being allowed to own things, while people living in encampments get their shit tossed in and are forced to move location constantly?

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            RVs aren’t meant to be year-round dwellings. Especially not the kind you call a camper attached to a truck.

            • LanternEverywhere
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Sure, but imo it still qualifies as enough to mean you’re not homeless. There are other terms that might apply though, like shelter insecure or something. If you have a safe place where you can sleep in, and come and go as you please, and that you legally have the rights to possess, then you aren’t homeless

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          202 months ago

          I have a home so you can’t arrest me!

          I dont have an address so you can’t send me child support letters!