• the_crotch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wouldn’t take steps to ban cigarettes. Prohibition never stops people from doing what they want to do, usually makes things worse, and usually disproportionally affects minorities.

      • the_crotch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Stay the course. Smoking is trending down. Continue educational programs so everyone knows the risks, but ultimately leave it up to adults to make their own decisions.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      And yet, overall. Smoking reduction efforts in the US have been pretty effective.

      • the_crotch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        How many of these smoking reduction efforts have banned cigarettes

          • the_crotch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            One would think tobacco being criminalized would have been bigger news

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Well, since this isn’t proposing “banning cigarettes”, and nothing in the parent comments was about banning them outright (in fact the opposite was the point), then it made no sense that you would be asking about that.

              I thought you meant banning SOME cigarettes (or ban smoking in some cases) which would have been way more relevant.

              But there are many kinds of cigarettes that are banned (and this would be another one), and many scenarios where smoking is banned. Those sorts of things have been part of why smoking has dropped significantly, without outright banning.

              Hence, you know, the context of the things you were replying to here.