President Joe Biden announced Thursday $3 billion toward identifying and replacing the nation’s unsafe lead pipes, a long-sought move to improve public health and clean drinking water that will be paid for by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

Biden unveiled the new funding in North Carolina, a battleground state Democrats have lost to Donald Trump in the past two presidential elections but are feeling more bullish toward due to an abortion measure on the state’s ballot this November.

The Environmental Protection Agency will invest $3 billion in the lead pipe effort annually through 2026, Administrator Michael Regan told reporters. He said that nearly 50% of the funding will go to disadvantaged communities – and a fact sheet from the Biden administration noted that “lead exposure disproportionately affects communities of color and low-income families.”

  • @gravitas_deficiency
    link
    English
    22 months ago

    So I was going to apologize for my misinterpretation and express some appreciation for giving me some new knowledge, but then that last sentence happened.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      02 months ago

      Sorry for insulting you.

      But how else do you call a person who finds an ethnic slur in a word they don’t understand? I’d understand if I’d say anything about Ukrainians at all.

      If I do something like that (happens regularly) I admit that I’m an idiot. I’m actually glad to discharge some of the frustration through that.

      Well, if you liked the clarification part, the anecdote itself is:

      "That’s a skull of Alexander when he was 5, that’s when he was 25, that’s when he was dead. Any questions?

      • How can one person have 3 skulls?

      • And you’re what?

      • A dachnik (that is, a person with a garden and now usually, then maybe a house without utilities in the countryside, living in the city).

      • Then go to hell, the lecture is for kolkhozniks."

      The anecdote refers to the expected intelligence level of typical Soviet brochures, like of an enthusiast worker who offered to reduce the acceptable percentage of discarded product to “none” instead of some percent and similar.

      And, well, maybe to how Soviet officials viewed their population.

      • @gravitas_deficiency
        link
        English
        12 months ago

        For what it’s worth, I do actually appreciate the anthropological background. And yes, I was being rather foolish in my initial comment.