• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 month ago

    AFAIK they didn’t actually ban anything? I mean, the terms were written out but there was no actions taken on it.

    These kinds of clauses are very extremely common in Japan, so while its surprising that a Chinese company would include such a clause (surprising to me only because I don’t know if China has the same type of laws regarding defamation Japan has), its also not surprising that it would be translated in this way. Its likely a clause that was never supposed to make it to countries who don’t have Japanese-like defamation laws and someone made a mistake by not removing it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 month ago

      I’m not allowed to say ANYTHING negative if someone calls for a staff reference for a past staff member. Not if its a verifiable fact, not if I can provide evidence, not if I CAN SHOW THEY WERE CHARGED FOR WHAT GOT THEM FIRED.

      The most negative thing I can do is say “They worked here between these dates” and repeat that answer for any and all questions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yep. Pretty crummy laws, IMO.

        EDIT: Wait, are you referring to China? As Japan AFAIK is the same then.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          Nope, Australia.

          But thats a company policy. My point is that if you dont like the policy, dont take the code for a free playtest of the game.