• casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    You illustrated the point better than I had the energy to do-- I simply don’t care enough to be that eloquent because the majority of what I get is nonsense in return. So instead of wasting my time, I chose to take the lazy route and encourage people to come to a consensus on this one key point so that the point you made would become irrefutable.

    Neither trans nor cis are slurs by default, but anything can be a slur if used in a derogatory manner-- I think some comedian had a bit about this, but I can’t recall who and I’m sure even if I did there’s a good chance someone would give me a nasty label for saying such comedian made a good point…

    But the same people that say trans can be a slur, cannot deny in good faith that cis cannot be a slur. They are both simple classifiers with no basis on prejudice. But some people will still argue they are slurs simply because they are used prominently in derogatory contexts.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s not the issue. The issue is that Twitter acts like it is automatically considered a slur, rather than something that is only a slur in certain contexts.

      There’s also the matter of Twitter doing very little about the Nazis on its platform other than giving them a boost.