The highlight for me is coming up with some weird pseudoscience justification for why it’s okay to hit your kids.

  • deborah@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you walked by some strangers having a conversation with each other out in public and one of them said something you didn’t understand, would you go running up to them saying “please don’t talk to each other without explaining everything to me, I think you’re making stuff up because I don’t have all the context”?

    (You would not.)

    If you have something to ask OP, ask it. Politely. Don’t come in to somebody else’s conversation demanding context and calling them a liar.

    • Mike Knell@blat.at
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      @gnomicutterance @VirtualOdour Well, exactly. For the benefit of Mr Odour here, I’m in Austria (that’s the one without the kangaroos) where although physical punishment of children was first made an explicit offence in 1989 the “right” of parents to hit their children was removed from §145 of the Allgemeine Bürgerliche Gesetzbuch in 1977. Here’s the 1811 text that was deleted. Happy now?

      • self@awful.systemsM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m fed up with you shitting up this discussion you weren’t invited to participate in

        • VirtualOdour
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Of course I was invited this is a public forum, are you lost?

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        “basic consideration” the fuck? you fucking walked into the thread sight unseen and started throwing your toys out

        find some grass, and sit on it