A new South Dakota policy to stop the use of gender pronouns by public university faculty and staff in official correspondence is also keeping Native American employees from listing their tribal affiliations in a state with a long and violent history of conflict with tribes.

Two University of South Dakota faculty members, Megan Red Shirt-Shaw and her husband, John Little, have long included their gender pronouns and tribal affiliations in their work email signature blocks. But both received written warnings from the university in March that doing so violated a policy adopted in December by the South Dakota Board of Regents.

“I was told that I had 5 days to remove my tribal affiliation and pronouns,” Little said in an email to The Associated Press. “I believe the exact wording was that I had ‘5 days to correct the behavior.’ If my tribal affiliation and pronouns were not removed after the 5 days, then administrators would meet and make a decision whether I would be suspended (with or without pay) and/or immediately terminated.”

The policy is billed by the board as a simple branding and communications policy. It came only months after Republican Gov. Kristi Noem sent a letter to the regents that railed against “liberal ideologies” on college campuses and called for the board to ban drag shows on campus and “remove all references to preferred pronouns in school materials,” among other things.

  • prole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    What’s the point of comments like this? Truly… Are we in a vacuum? No? Then why even continue with whatever inane bullshit that came next?

    Yeah dude perfect analogy. These people are doing this to promote solidarity and show that we’re all the same and shouldn’t be murdering each other. Totally comparable situation.

    • molave@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I get that using and promoting labels for your group promote solidarity. It can also cause division simply because when you call yourself “X”, it’s inevitable that people would form opinions and at worst prejudices on what is “not X”.

      My point? Similar policies may result in different outcomes.