The EFF soon created a crossword, overlaid it on top of the monkey, and featured it on their website.

August 2014 – Photographer David Slater sent a copyright takedown notice to the Wikimedia Commons over a photograph of a Celebes crested macaque taken on one of his cameras, which at the time was being operated by the macaque, resulting in a “monkey selfie”. The Wikimedia Foundation dismissed the claims, asserting that the photograph, having been taken by a non-human animal, rather than Slater, is in the public domain per United States law.[277][278] Subsequently, a court in San Francisco ruled copyright protection could not be applied to the monkey and a University of Michigan law professor said “the original monkey selfie is in the public domain.”[279]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_dispute :

In September 2015, PETA filed a lawsuit against Slater and Blurb, requesting that the copyright be assigned to the macaque and that PETA be appointed to administer proceeds from the photos for the endangered species’ benefit.[6] In dismissing PETA’s case, a federal district court ruled that a monkey cannot own copyright under US law.[7] PETA appealed.

In May 2018, Condé Nast Entertainment acquired the rights from Slater to make a documentary film related to the monkey selfie dispute. The project was being overseen by Dawn Ostroff and Jeremy Steckler.[55]

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7226 days ago

    Also PETA got involved, because they’ve never seen an animal-centric story they couldn’t weasel themselves into.

    • @fsxylo
      link
      English
      21
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Lol, of course they wanted the proceeds. Peta and shameless whoring, name a more iconic duo.

    • @mindbleach
      link
      English
      126 days ago

      Funniest example by far is Whiplash, a PS2 game where a weasel is chained to a rabbit and swings him around as a weapon.

      PETA endorsed the game’s message.