• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7129 days ago

      DOD doesn’t want to pay upkeep and it was designed for roadside bombs in remote mountains not Iranian drones.

      Might as well give it to the cops, in case one of their supporters accidentally hits it while trying to bomb a women’s shelter or something.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2629 days ago

        They’re specifically not to be used on roads because they don’t fit, rollover if sneezed at and destroy our roads but fuck it they’re police right?

        • @brbposting
          link
          English
          2529 days ago

          What are you talking about, that would fit perfectly parked in the bike lane

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            729 days ago

            I dunno, it might have to “monster truck” its way over all the other motor vehicles already parked in the bike lane.

        • @thetreesaysbark
          link
          English
          629 days ago

          I’m confused about the design. If it’s designed for mountain areas but is top heavy and rolls easy, isn’t that a major design floor for an area where the terrain is likely to be steep from left to right in parts?

          Maybe my idea of terrain in mountainous areas is wrong.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            529 days ago

            It’s designed to stay on roads.
            Those roads are natural choke points where bombs are often hidden on the ground, which results in a high and heavy design.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              329 days ago

              MATV begs to differ. We always had the technology. We just wanted a cheap solution to stop taking so many casualties.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              229 days ago

              Correct, they move slow but they are quite explosion survivable past the original design.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            228 days ago

            Tall but narrower than other options while having survivability in case of getting IED’d. I know HMMWVs are actually big but the MRAPs didn’t all have a much larger footprint.

            Fun fact though, they had to add a gunners harness because the gunners were more likely to die in a roll over. Armored plates all up over your back but you get crushed because the Specialist driving hasn’t even driven anything bigger than his Civic and doesn’t have enough hours dealing with actual Afghan roads.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          128 days ago

          Hey, you can easily get them up to 50mph on an airfield runway and feel the death rattle telling you to slow down. It’s basically all operator error.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      329 days ago

      Is it “gifted” to them, or are they paying taxpayer dollars to purchase these war machines? When they’re turning our local communities into war zones, some of us might even question whether we should reduce their funding significantly if this is what they’re squandering our money on.

      Watch them cower inside of this vehicle, idling in the parking lot as a school shooter empties one magazine after another.