• minorsecond@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why does it seem like there are a ton more conservatives here on Lemmy than there were on Reddit?

        • minorsecond@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know how I feel about it. On one hand, it makes for less of an echo chamber. On the other hand, their thoughts are fucking stupid and it hurts my brain to see them.

          • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            They have the right to be here and express their thoughts.

            What they don’t have is a right to our attention.

            Ignore them and block accounts that get annoying.

        • minorsecond@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, I think they’re definitely still in the minority. It seems like there’s a larger proportion of them here than on reddit. I see more of their opinions here. Maybe that’s just how the algo works here regarding upvotes & downvotes and how comments are displayed.

          • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s worst on lemmy.world I’ve noticed. Beehaw was right to defederate. Y’all need to tell them in the kindest possible words to go die over and over again until they don’t come back or you’ll end up like voat.

      • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Happy to have them here. I almost never agree with them, but not only is it good to have your opinion challenged (though often wearying to have to repeat yourself), it’s good for THEM to have their opinion challenged too. Maybe only 1/100 will change their opinion after being challenged and seeing that their opinion is very much in the minority, but that’s 1/100 more than if we were all chatting away in a safe space with no opposing views.

        (and to be clear, no I don’t think shit like nazis, devout racists etc is an ‘opposing view’ that deserves any debate)

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For every person that choose to leave reddit…

        There’s 5-10 “conservatives” who were ip banned and dont have a choice between Reddit and Lemmy.

      • ShakyPerception@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They are not getting down-voted into nothingness for refusing to tow the party line.

        I appreciate the variety of opinions presented here. Plus (in my experience) the conversation has been civil.

        • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah. I hardcore disagree with conservatives as a libertarian socialist myself, but I always want to hear what people who disagree with me (and people who agree with me) are saying, and engage in civil conversation with people who actually believe what they say.

          The problem for me comes when shills (people who don’t believe what they say but get paid to say it) come into the conversation, or when people use outright disingenuous arguments (usually strawmans).

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Assuming any conservative is arguing in good faith is your first mistake.

            • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You very well may be correct, but I always like to assume people are good and are arguing in good faith until proven otherwise.

              If I can “steelman” (opposite of strawman) their position, and argue against it easilly, I see no reason not to do so, and that also makes for a better argument for other people viewing the comment thread who may believe the false notion that climate change is either fake or not caused by humans.

              To me, trying to argue that climate change is fake or not caused by humans is the same as trying to argue that the Earth is flat. Very easy to debunk.

              • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                That is a recipe for wasting a huge amount of time in people whose main goal is to waste your time.

            • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If they actually believe it, I would like to argue the factual point, which is very easy to do. If they don’t believe what they are saying, then yes, I have a problem with it.

              There is plenty of evidence pointing to the fact that climate change is real and that it is caused by humans. If they choose to not listen to evidence and hard facts, then they lost the debate. If they say that big money funded those studies, simply point them to the Big Oil-funded studies claiming that climate change is false, and the fact that they originally found that it was true, and then tried to bury it.

          • ShakyPerception@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            while I do completely agree with Apple depressing lack of any innovation recently, until modern foldable phones become commonplace, there is only so much you can do with a brick of glass.

          • Fisting for Freedom
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s kind of a dumb way to make the point. Innovation isn’t necessarily apparent in a photo with no context or information. A bronze sword and a steel sword still both look like swords, but there a huge technological difference between them.

              • Fisting for Freedom
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Your implied point was that there wasn’t any innovation, but there was, by your own admission above.

                Don’t shift the goalposts by latching onto an analogy I made. The fact is that the technology has progressed quite quickly over the timespan represented in those pictures, and that fact underscores what’s wrong with the post you were responding to - it wasn’t a handful of rich folk that did it, it was the work of hundreds of thousands of people around the world. You had a much better point to make than the one you did.

                  • Fisting for Freedom
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Honestly, you seem like you’re having trouble being calm. I’m sorry if I played any part in making you feel that way, I didn’t mean to upset you or hurt your feelings. It’s ok if we don’t agree.

          • jerkface@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hey, they came up with some interesting colours no one has used in 80 years.

          • yesman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s a good point. You must have a really smart boss to come up with ideas like that.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            No it doesn’t. Worker-owned co-ops exist. Didn’t you say you’re in Germany? You should know all about that.

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago
                  • prole
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I’m just fascinated with how brains like yours work. Assuming any of this is in good faith, that is.

                    It’s like you just refuse to accept new information that may change how you view things. You’re so resistant to admitting (to yourself, it seems) that you might be wrong, that your brain has “mechanisms” for making sure you never even have to consider the possibility.

                    Every single point anyone makes, you are able to come up with some “counter” that, in your mind, confirms that you’ve always been right (it doesn’t), and everyone who’s arguing with you is just trying to trick you into admitting you were wrong, or that you learned something.

                    It can never just be, “hey I didn’t know that about my country, that’s interesting. Maybe I should reconsider…” Because, you know, Germany has been the most financially successful EU nation basically since he inception of the Union, so your counter that worker stake in companies doesn’t work is not based in reality. They’re fucking thriving. You (allegedly) live there, my guy. Learn about why your own country is so successful.

                    The lengths you will go to avoid learning something new or admitting you might have been wrong about something… Like it’s protecting itself from new information. It’s fascinating.

          • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            32
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            UserDoesNotExist, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this website is now dumber for having read it. I award you one downvote, and may God have mercy on your soul.

              • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                1 year ago

                My dude, your argument boils down to “this is the way we’ve always done it so this is the way it must be”.

                Have you considered the possibility that if innovation were to slow, and companies DIDN’T insist on quarter-after-quarter growth, the world might just continue to turn? That while the richest individuals may be slightly less rich, the vast majority of people would continue their lives with no negative consequences?

                  • Void_Reader@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    14
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Have you considered that this too might be an ‘experiment’?

                    Defenders of monarchy and the divine right of kings used to argue the exact same thing - that we tried democracy before and it failed in the Roman Republic and Ancient Greece - so clearly feudal monarchy is the best, right?

                    Yet here we are, experimenting again.

                    Why is this joke of a system the ideal? It doesn’t produce innovation - most of the stuff that led to the internet and modern computing came out of DARPA and various govt funded universities. All of our space advancements were from state-run NASA and the Soviet space programme. The wealthy CEO types only start ‘innovating’ after taxpayers fund most of the R&D. Same with medical advancements, material science, physics - almost every single positive innovation has come from state-run, taxpayer-funded, or non-profit institutions.

                    Maybe try reading a little bit more about all this innovation you seem so fond of:

                    https://academic.oup.com/ser/article/7/3/459/1693191

                    https://demos.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/Entrepreneurial_State_-_web.pdf

                    https://yewtu.be/watch?v=oLLxpAZzy0s

                  • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    And sooner or later I will hopefully have children.

                    And when the average summer day is 60c and crops fail every single year, and Nestle has taken half our drinking water, and the smoke in the air from wildfires is giving everyone asthma, and deadly storms happen year round, and the coasts erode, and wars break out for the remaining water/etc, what will you tell them? Will you tell them to look at the brilliant ‘innovator’ CEO’s who intentionally shut down electric cars? The CEO’s who found out climate change was happening sixty years ago and intentionally hid it to keep themselves rich, what do you tell your kids about that?

                    What innovation is worth your children dying early?

                  • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You know, as a member of the SSBN force, occasionally during thermonuclear launch exercises I take a moment to regret the death of humanity and the biosphere. People like you, on the other hand, are what steels my resolve to flip the switch with gusto. I hope you know that I’ll be thinking of you, should I receive the order to commence procedures to launch.

              • Decoy321@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Do you not understand the system at live in is actively dooming us all? Why are you so vehemently defending it? Especially when you can acknowledge that other systems can exist?

                Why would you think that companies going bankrupt is somehow worse than people being increasingly unable to live.

                  • 80085@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I cannot imagine a system that would lead to more freedom, better education or innovation.

                    LOL.

                    Even though I acknowledge that other systems have been tried in the past, I also believe that all of them, except capitalism with a few social tweaks, have failed.

                    Capitalism fails every ~8 years requiring the use of vast amounts of public funds to keep afloat. I’d also say if fails daily if you look at all the needless suffering occuring in the world today, especially in the most “free market” countries and the countries these exploit. We have “socialism for the rich, capitalism for everyone else,” as Jon Stewart would say.

                  • Jimbo@yiffit.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Hey guy uhhh

                    Check the planet. It is literally burning right now and we are all going to either die, or have our lives massively changed by this climate catastrophe.

                  • 3N1GMA@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Lol people like you that believe humanity will always overcome make me laugh. Talk to any environmental scientist and they will tell you we’re fucked. There’s no secret technology coming to save us.

                  • Void_Reader@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The ‘future’ is not inevitable. There have been countless collapses in history. Our technology doesn’t make us immune. The people of the major Bronze Age powers probably thought the same.

                    Also we do not have the means for weather engineering. If you’re talking about SRM, we have no idea what its consequences will be or how to do it effectively. It’s all theoretical. No aircraft we currently have can do this stuff. Sure, we could design it and build one, but then you need global governance to actually implement it properly. Not to mention the risk of ‘termination shock’ and countless others.

                    Have a look at the scientific literature: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Stratospheric-aerosol-injection-tactics-and-costs-Smith-Wagner/e4e5a78335eda8c16557b32af915798b06091362#cited-papers

                    Would you seriously risk the future of life on Earth on something this experimental?

                    I fear this arrogance will kill a lot of people and cause a lot of suffering.

          • Void_Reader@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            btw they do store a lot of their money in vaults where it doesnt benefit the economy at all.

            This is in the form of expensive art that stays in containers in tax-free zones, and offshore accounts in tax havens.

            Please educate yourself.

            https://archive-yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/how-wealthy-sell-treasures-tax-free

            https://www.icij.org/inside-icij/2017/09/7-charts-show-how-rich-hide-their-cash

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Papers

            https://academic.oup.com/ser/article/20/2/539/6500315

              • Void_Reader@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Did you read any of those links? 10% of world GDP. That’s not relatively little. That’s insane.

                And stocks doesn’t automatically mean good. How much of that is speculative bubbles and hype-driven overvalued stocks?

                  • Void_Reader@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The rich would just leave the country and some other country would profit from their taxes.

                    This is an oft-repeated talking point but usually contradicted by data. Sounds smart but isn’t smart.

                    https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2017/nov/20/if-you-tax-the-rich-they-wont-leave-us-data-contradicts-millionaires-threats

                    https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2017/11/20/if-you-tax-the-rich-they-dont-move-they-just-pay/

                    Rich people are people and most people don’t just up and leave behind places they’ve built their lives in unless under extreme pressure. A few billionaires might relocate to the Bahamas but they’re not going to be able to take their mansions and penthouses with them - and they lose out on the markets, infrastructure, and other benefits of their home countries. That’s a major incentive to just pay the taxes.

                    If you believe to know which ones are overvalued, then you should try to go buy short positions in them. Maybe you become rich then?

                    Who says I haven’t done that already?

                    The stock market is relatively precise, it also projects potential into the future.

                    The stock market is not precise. I have data and papers discussing this - but there’s no need for them. I’ll instead leave you with a simple question: if the stock market is so precise, why is there a major crash every decade?

                    Due to that many stocks to combat climate change have risen in popularity and a lot of money has been brought to said companies by purely capitalistic driven motives.

                    Sure, purely capitalistic motives, which is why a lot of these are impractical venture capital BS and outright scams. It is currently more profitable to greenwash than it is to actually solve the problem.

                    You don’t have to take my word for it: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/26/chamath-palihapitiya-esg-investing-is-a-complete-fraud.html

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wealth hoarding is a massive problem irl