• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Allowing aggression to go unchecked is the opposite of opposing war - it literally encourages more.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 days ago

      Yes it does, when the war you’re opposing is one intended to bring consequences to a dictator. Unopposed dictators continue to dictate and empower other dictators. You don’t stop a bully by turning the other cheek. That just gets you punched in both sides of the face. You stop a bully by bringing them consequences to their actions. When there are no consequences, the actions continue.

      If you’d like to read more about this, please check into the entirety of human history.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        222 days ago

        Literally nowhere in any of my responses have I alluded to me being an absolute pacifist. In fact, one of my replies implies that I’m not, I’m just against war (because, you know, it’s fucking atrocious for all involved), because you can absolutely oppose the act of war while still being down for some violence yourself.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      022 days ago

      My argument is they should have been shot.

      The weak little dictator isn’t going to get into a shooting match with the South over a couple of dead soldiers.

      If you think they will then you know nothing of the history.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        522 days ago

        killing two soldiers doesn’t solve anything. They should invade north korea and fill it with a thousand McDonalds. Its the only way to restore freedom™