@[email protected] to Political [email protected] • 18 days agoThe debate gets interesting sometimeslemmy.worldimagemessage-square448fedilinkarrow-up1880arrow-down1162
arrow-up1718arrow-down1imageThe debate gets interesting sometimeslemmy.world@[email protected] to Political [email protected] • 18 days agomessage-square448fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-6•18 days agoWell, mathematically it’s only half as bad. -1 lesser evil +1 greater evil Vs. -1 lesser evil +0 greater evil
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•18 days agoYour math is wrong. You wouldn’t be cancelling out the greater evil with the vote for the lesser evil, so its actually twice as bad (or 4x what you were thinking). 0 lesser evil +1 greater evil
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-218 days agoExactly. There is unfortunately no option to wind up with a non-evil result, your only options are greater evil result or lesser evil result. By voting 3rd party you didn’t reduce the chance of greater evil result, AND you didn’t increase the chance of lesser evil result.
Well, mathematically it’s only half as bad.
-1 lesser evil +1 greater evil
Vs.
-1 lesser evil +0 greater evil
Your math is wrong. You wouldn’t be cancelling out the greater evil with the vote for the lesser evil, so its actually twice as bad (or 4x what you were thinking).
0 lesser evil +1 greater evil
Exactly.
There is unfortunately no option to wind up with a non-evil result, your only options are greater evil result or lesser evil result.
By voting 3rd party you didn’t reduce the chance of greater evil result, AND you didn’t increase the chance of lesser evil result.