• emergencyfood
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    ACs are not being provided to reduce emissions. Most teams seem to be respecting this decision.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Lol that’s bullshit, someone fucked up to save a dime and they’re trying spin it

      • emergencyfood
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        First of all, [citation needed]. Second, even if it is, a good message is being sent.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, it’s just posturing. The emissions from AC at the Olympic Village would have zero impact on climate change. This is just green washing for public perception points.

      • emergencyfood
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The emissions saved from removing a few hundred ACs are negligible. But the message it sends to the millions watching the Olympics is significant. Which, again, is why I am hoping there will be at least some symbolic action against rule-breakers - it will start a conversation about the need to regulate / ban ACs.