The U.S. Olympic team is one of a handful that will supply air conditioners for their athletes at the Paris Games in a move that undercuts organizers’ plans to cut carbon emissions.

U.S. Olympic and Paralympic CEO Sarah Hirshland said Friday that while the U.S. team appreciates efforts aimed at sustainability, the federation would be supplying AC units for what is typically the largest contingent of athletes at the Summer Games.

“As you can imagine, this is a period of time in which consistency and predictability is critical for Team USA’s performance,” Hirshland said. “In our conversations with athletes, this was a very high priority and something that the athletes felt was a critical component in their performance capability.”

The Washington Post reported earlier this month that Germany, Australia, Italy, Canada and Britain were among the other countries with plans to bring air conditioners to France.

  • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    199
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I have a wild idea here. What if, they didn’t build an entire Olympic sports complex with multiple stadiums and other infrastructure every 2 years around the globe? Maybe that would save a bit on carbon emissions. And hey, the billions that would have gone to building that complex? Maybe that could go toward building up renewable energy resources instead.

    But no that’s crazy, it’s the portable air conditioning units for some athlete’s apartments that are the problem. /s

    Though some props to Paris, it sounds like they didn’t have nearly the amount of insane new constructions that some Olympics have had. Sounds like only one major new venue with most venues being used already pre-existing.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2024/02/11/paris-2024-unveils-only-purpose-built-olympics-venue-in-city-five-months-ahead-of-summer-games/72561147007/

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah, it should only be held in countries that have the required infrastructure in place, but the whole IOC is corrupt from top to bottom.

        • errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s true for a few cherry picked olympics, but there are many where the facilities are still used to this day. In this article it’s really only Beijing and Brazil that are fair to highlight IMO (Greece is 20 years ago and that country went through a massive economic crisis, and Sarajevo was 40 years ago and went through a civil war).

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just hold it in Greece every time. Those poor fuckers could use some foreign money coming in every few years, they might not have to work 6 days a week then.

      • tankplanker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        Greece is too warm now for summer games, it’s significantly hotter than Paris right now and can hit a sustained over 40c without much problem. Paris isn’t great in the summer but it’s better than Greece. If we want one location to host the games during the summer then I pick Bergen, significantly cooler than Paris.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Just hold it in Greece every time.

        One of the hottest places in Europe, atm.

        By all means, it wouldn’t hurt to build high efficiency stadiums and sports centers the one time in a big “Olympics Zone” that gets used regularly rather than building a big new thing every two years at a random spot in the world. But if you’re looking for maximal efficiency, Greece ain’t your girl. Its cooking at record-breaking 46.4°C temperatures over there, weeks before the games even start.

        Might as well make Qatar the permanent venue for the World Cup.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Greece is the last place it should be held, the country is an absolute mess. It could honestly be split over Western Europe, countries like France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, UK. Places that have stadiums and such already, places that will still use any new infrastructure that is built.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Imo, we should have one, or at most, two Olympic states. They’d be small countries that are more-or-less politically neutral, and instead of sending teams, their purpose would be to host the Summer and/or Winter Olympics. Construction, maintenance and upgrades of the facilities would be paid for by participating countries, as a percentage of their GDP. That way, the hosting country(ies) wouldn’t have to spend billions building the facilities, they get guaranteed tourism every 2~4 years, the facilities get reused, non-hosting countries have a place to measure their penis size, don’t have to spend outrageous sums to build their own facilities (they’re all paying together, after all), don’t have to bulldoze houses or forests, be concerned with water quality, and probably many other bonuses I’m not thinking of.

      Bonus points if the facilities are open year-round for Olympians to train at, so that the athletes are more used to the climate, equipment, tracks, trails, etc.

      The biggest downside is that hosting the Olympics is prestigious itself and generates a lot of tourism revenue (which in this case, would only be going to the “static” host(s)). It’s a chance for the host country to show off their economic strength, culture (like during the opening ceremonies), and more. You’d have to convince countries that they’re better off without the tourism and chance to flaunt their wealth.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Or we could simply be logical and help fight climate change by not having the Olympics at all

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      I have a wild idea. What if humans prioritise making money now over their children being able to exist tomorrow?

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      There was just an article posted around here about future games in Los Angeles …. Where one of the venues is in Oklahoma, unless I got seriously trolled, for exactly this: trying not to build as much new stuff.

      Here in Boston when they were talking about putting in a bid, all the discussion was about upgrading athletic facilities for all the regional colleges, and getting more hotels built to handle more tourism

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It was far more nuanced than that. They also wanted their own lane on 91 so they wouldn’t have to deal with Boston traffic.

        https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2015/06/30/boston-2024-olympic-lanes/

        https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/30/sports/olympics/bostons-revised-24-bid-criticized-as-incomplete.html?_r=0

        • “Mass media encouraging citizens and tourists to use public transportation and carpooling”
        • “Flexible hours at local businesses”
        • “Rerouting long-haul trucking around the city”
        • “Intelligent highway systems technology”
        • “Manually-controlled traffic lights”
        • “New one-way streets in busy areas to create better flow”

        Never been more proud to go tell the IOC to go fuck themselves with a huge cactus.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Those all sound like good things, though. There shouldn’t be an interstate right through downtown. And god knows transportation in Boston is a mess and desperately needs work.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Right, plus in the context of not building new stuff for a temporary need

            • too bad they didn’t know how easy it would be for so many of us to work from home
            • roping off a lane may offend our egalitarianism, but it’s a temporary change
            • even if we had to build new lanes, they would sure as hell get used (especially since there’s never enough capacity on the T)
  • Delta_V@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    You gotta wonder WTF the French were thinking when they decided to force people into the sweltering insomnia of 80 degrees indoors at night just for the sake of creating the appearance that climate change is the fault of the dispossessed proletariat running air conditioners to survive global heating, and pretending like the owners of the means of production aren’t actually in a position to change how the economy functions.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    They have simulated conditions in the parts of the accommodation most exposed to the sun and have tested the effectiveness of the cooling system with an objective to keep the indoor temperature between 23 and 26 degrees Celsius (73 and 79 degrees Fahrenheit).

    Then it continues with:

    The geothermal energy system will ensure that the temperature in the athlete apartments in the Seine-Saint-Denis suburb does not rise above 26 degrees Celsius (79 degrees Fahrenheit) at night…

    They also go on to say that the apartments will be around 11°F cooler than outside temps, which are expected to be over 100°F.

    Let’s just stop for a second and let that sink in. First of all, who keeps their houses up to 79°F at night? Is that a thing in Paris/Europe? Do they have ceiling fans or standing fans to keep the air moving?

    That aside, these are athletes who spend their daytime hours sweating their asses off, performing feats us mere mortals couldn’t dream of achieving. And, yet they are expected to “adapt” to have to suffer at night too? Fuck that noise.

    I’m all for reducing our carbon footprint, and finding more natural ways to keep cool in the hot summer months. But we also have to be practical and reasonable. I don’t blame those countries for giving France the middle finger and bringing their own ACs.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      First of all, who keeps their houses up to 79°F at night?

      I do. When I am in Florida, I set my AC to 78 at night but room temperature can go to 80 before the AC kicks in. The key is having a nice ceiling fan. Normally the discomfort comes from hot and humid air hovering around your body (you do make heat). Having a constant breeze on your skin keeps you comfortable.

      That said, I am not an athlete trying to achieve my personal best while the entire world is watching. I think it is reprehensible to not provide athletes with a climate controlled environment in which to rest.

      • Late2TheParty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        OHMYGOSH! I am so glad to meet you! I lived in the South for about a decade and I met so many people who were so opposite of me (having grown up in New England) and I miss them now that I’ve moved away. I will text them. Thanks for the reminder.

    • Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      In the summer, what temp do Europeans keep their homes? When I’ve been in Europe (northern US too) it’s always so hot indoors, summer and winter. I thought it was a low energy use thing until i encountered the crazy indoor heat in the winter.

    • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      24 °C is at the upper end of the comfort zone. 26 is a bit warm but nothing to cry about. I hate it when people crank up the ac to 13 °C. How’s that comfortable?

  • Feliskatos 🐱@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 months ago

    The world will continue to get hotter year by year until climate change is solved. I’d fully expect to see more AC use, not less. This won’t be limited just to athletes, but it will be limited by affordability.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Big cities already periodically provide “Cooling Centers” to support the large population of working poor who can’t afford the sky high energy bills. I have no idea what rural communities do during a heat-wave induced brown out. Everyone gets in the lake that’s full of industrial agricultural run off? They retreat into the mines, like a bunch of Morlocks? Y’all just fucking die?

      But this is entirely unsustainable long term. Either we find a way to keep our large populations cool during the killer hot months or we stop having large populations all together.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Humans ceasing to emit carbon dioxide is inevitable. I reckon this will happen some time before the average global temperature reaches 100 degrees C.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Climate change will never be solved. It wont even be mitigated.

      It will just continue to get worse until it stops being a curiosity the rich invest into solutions (which will never be practical for scale) for positive coverage, and shift their money into their survival plans… Bunkers, Sea Living (under sea or on ships), or space ships to get to lunar colonies or mars.

      A small, lucky few of the proletariate might even get selected to be “Saved” along side them, because afterall… the Rich need their menial labor.

      And everyone else will suffer and die.

  • Fester@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The geothermal energy system will ensure that the temperature in the athlete apartments in the Seine-Saint-Denis suburb does not rise above 26 degrees Celsius (79 degrees Fahrenheit) at night

    Sorry, but fuck that. Hopefully the system will help the ACs that everyone will need to bring to use less power though.

    • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ok, maybe I’m just spoiled somehow, but that’s REALLY high for sleeping. If it’s over about 72 I just straight-up cannot sleep. I can flex that a little with good airflow and low humidity (windows open).

      I can’t possible imagine having to sleep in that temp after a full day of strenuous physical activity. I guess if you were somehow used to it but that seems crazy.

      Furthermore, does this cooling strategy (minus the AC units shipped in) even come close to offsetting the burned fossil fuels to actually move all these athletes to another country and set up the games? Asking cause that seems kinda relevant…

      • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I can barely sleep at 70 degrees. Anything more and I just wake up covered in sweat and dying. 79? I’d probably just die.

        • andrewta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          I set my ac to 74 over night. Sometimes even 75. Depending on humidity levels and outdoor air temp, I might drop the indoor temp to 74 and then once that indoor air temp is hit, just turn off the ac and open the windows. Place stays cool over night.

          But 79? Yeah… No.

          • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yea, I live in bog swamp-ass Houston. It’s currently 83 degrees out at 10 pm. No way in hell I’d open a window to sleep. And if I did I would probably get west nile or some shit.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    If they gave a fuck about sustainability they wouldn’t be hosting the Olympics in Paris in the middle of summer.

  • itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    How many carbon emissions will the chartered plans release when they transport all of the athletes and their gear to France?

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why aren’t Olympic games distributed between, let’s say, 8-10 countries? Maybe make them continent games. Distribute the cost and benefits, and maybe make then bi-annual, fairer to athletes by enlarging the window of opportunity.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because the bidding/bribing process is where a lot of grifters get rich. The construction contracts are where the others get rich. With your simpler less wasteful system all those worthless people might have to work for a living.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Olympic organizers have touted plans to cool rooms in the Athletes Village, which will house more than 15,000 Olympians and sports officials over the course of the games, using a system of cooling pipes underneath the floors.

    The average high in Paris on Aug. 1 is 26 degrees Celsius (79 degrees Fahrenheit). The objective is to keep the rooms between 23-26 degrees (73-79 degrees Fahrenheit). The rooms will also be equipped with fans.

    That could be a tad warm depending on sun exposure.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wonder how the electrical grid in the Olympic Village will fare when it will be overloaded with probably thousands of unexpected ACs.

    And I also wonder what the organizers had in mind when they designed this “low carbon” thing. I assume the houses will be used for other means after this summer - did they expect those people to live without AC, too?

      • Zatore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Probably not. The US electric grid is 60hz and France is 50hz. An inverter large enough to rectify the AC electric into DC then invert back into 60hz AC would be absolutely massive. It would also be severely inefficient. I’m not sure what system them will be bringing but I’d guess it’s something like what the US military uses overseas.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why not Air Source AC? They are right now the most efficient climate control systems, to the point that many countries give tax credits for installation or replacement of older systems. Geothermal is probably better, but Air Source can be installed anywhere.

    I can now get AS splits for less that 400 (500-600 installed)€ in Spain, where AC is common. I fail to understand why Paris didn’t go that route.

    When planning and building, Air source + solar is essentially free (cost and carbon) climate control.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Air source heat pumps are just air conditioners that can move the heat in two directions because they have an extra valve installed. They’re no more special then air conditioners that only work one way. It’s the same science.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, no. That’an inverter, which they ALSO are. please read a bit. Inverters have been arund for a long time.

    • baru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I can now get AS splits for less that 400 (500-600 installed)€ in Spain, where AC is common.

      In Netherlands there’s a crazy markup on that. You need a local installer. Local installers get huge kickbacks from Dutch sellers. As a result pretty much all installers refuse to install anything bought yourself. Meaning, it costs thousands per AC instead of what it should be.