@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 days agoI just cited myself.mander.xyzimagemessage-square212fedilinkarrow-up1827arrow-down142
arrow-up1785arrow-down1imageI just cited myself.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 days agomessage-square212fedilink
minus-square@JohnDClaylinkEnglish-4•3 days agoThere are versions of math where that isn’t true, with infinitesimals that are not equal to zero. So I think it is an axium rather than a provable conclusion.
minus-squareJack RiddlelinkEnglish7•3 days agoThose versions have different axioms from which different things can be proven, but we don’t define 9.9 repeating as 1
There are versions of math where that isn’t true, with infinitesimals that are not equal to zero. So I think it is an axium rather than a provable conclusion.
Those versions have different axioms from which different things can be proven, but we don’t define 9.9 repeating as 1
That’s not what “axiom” means