Did the admins poll the community about it? Why was such measure so needed? If the tankie content is so annoying why not let users decide what they want to see or not and what they want to block?

I don’t like that the admins want to censor the content I can view or not. You guys are not protecting us nor doing us a favor, you’re imposing your views over everyone else by limiting the information we are able to receive.

I don’t support the devs views or the views in lemmygrad, but this is a dangerous precedent.

I’ve read several of the “arguments” for blocking the instance and all I can see is a bunch of people talking about politics and arguing about “floods in the frontpage”. Well, let the user block communities if that’s the case, same way I’m already blocking communities I’m not interested.

I think the admins want to feel like Facebook moderation. I’d be OK with it if any instance repeatedly generated spam, security, doxxing or any other concern that couldn’t be solved by banning individuals, otherwise it’s just plain censorship.

I just don’t want the admins to use their power to decide what I can see or not. If this is going to be like this, I’ll leave for a better instance because I can see where this is going to.

  • AliaEnglish
    617·
    2 years ago

    Bet that’s what Spez said about the whole reddit blackout protest. Great to see this attitude over here…

    • Oni_eyesEnglish
      162·
      2 years ago

      Possibly, though spez didn’t have the option of joining the other servers that are in link and have looser rules regarding what content is acceptable.

      This user has all the ability to join any and all of the instances they desire, but chose to come to this one and then threw a fit about the moderation style.

      Tell me about the other Reddit clones that I could join to avoid spez. Please. Make that connection so that your point holds any water.

      • AliaEnglish
        38·
        2 years ago

        It’s not about having the ability to “take the highway”. Most people here don’t seem to be getting it. It’s about the way things are done.
        It’s still the early days of Lemmy as a whole, and things haven’t yet fallen into place. People come with different expectations, especially regarding censorship, myself included. There’s nothing in this instance’s ruleset that gives the idea that the 4th largest Lemmy instance is unacceptable due to “commie thought” and pro-China views.
        I say that as a non-communist that holds no love for China’s government, but I sure as shit ain’t threatened by them either.

        • Oni_eyesEnglish
          8·
          2 years ago

          You mean like the rule that states no bigotry?

          • AliaEnglish
            34·
            2 years ago

            How are they dealing in bigotry over there? And if they are under a set definition, are we to apply that definition equally to all other communities as well? Or just the commies?

            • Oni_eyesEnglish
              8·
              2 years ago

              Bigotry is “obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief, opinion, or faction, in particular prejudice against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group”

              When they are outright denying abuse of a minority group and supporting the power that abused, that becomes bigotry as an example.

              I would also expect exploding heads to be defederated due to the same reasons.

              We should apply that evenly and if the admin does not, then I will likely move to a server that does.

              As it stands now, it would have been nice if there was an announcement but even the examples brought up in this thread of “discussion about defederation in other instances” it was a user who asked why a server was defederated and the mod responded. There was no vote or community feedback at the start.