Not a tankie you little shit.

…in that it is a well proven case that marijuana consumption does not in fact lead to hard drug usage?

The general US public voted in favor of doing away with norms. Dems tried to keep it up but with the evidence in front of them, why try to maintain the high ground on an unstable cliff?

Honestly leaning towards a “Fuck it, Biden should pull what we think Trump will so we can get supreme court precedent saying “no” since it’s not a republican doing it.”

I’ve seen so many people doing the outrage bit over this.

The American people voted for the felon over law and order, they should get off their high horse when they get a light example what they want.

For me it was an old acquaintance in college. Dude was Japanese and the things he said about other Asian groups was distressing.

Yeah, that’s bullshit. These same engineers are the ones putting an exit only on ramp into an area with massive traffic, thus increasing traffic further. Or a left entrance five lanes over from the immediate right exit at a major crossover.

Engineers in Texas are assholes.

I still don’t like the combat system.

That fucked a lot of the game up, aside from the whole “releasing in parts across two console eras”

Third party voters are totally cool with whatever outcome since they know their election nominee has no chance without any third party support from local positions.

Make whatever rationalizing you need to do but if you know what both major parties stand for and you vote third, then you’re tacitly saying that the actual outcome doesn’t bother you as much as the perception you have of being slighted for not doing any of the foundational support work both other parties do.

I get it, you had a reason you couldn’t swallow either pill, but that means you have complicity with whatever the outcome is by your choice.

And the third party protests still can’t garner the 5% they need to be given federal boosts, which just goes to show how little planning and support goes into it.

Stand by your beliefs by all means, but let me know when your protest vote actually changes either major parties stance on anything since it hasn’t in… Ever. Which means third party people are just doing the protest dance over and over with no results.

A non-voters vote changes because people say the abstainers effectively “voted” for whoever won by not participating.

Your personal belief is cool, however a full third of the eligible voters (minus the 3-4% that third/write ins got) did not cast a ballot, and in so doing chose not to be involved.

I hope you also vote for and support the third party candidates that were surely on your ballot for lower positions since of course a serious third party would have plans for ground support before trying to just get into the highest elected position if they actually believe in offering another option.

How long do you think before that page goes missing?

Also, thank fuck the old prejudiced assholes writing laws had the forethought to add that in.

“Ah but you see the constitution didn’t say anything about state boards promoting one religion over others”- those fuckers

He’s already killed tons of people over the years. See his antivax work in Africa.

Which would “change” if the other side won. It’s a decision to not be involved which means accepting either side but not preferring one. A little different than supporting one side over another.

Ehhhhh, of the eligible voters like 33.5% voted for him, 32% voted against, and 34.5% just didn’t participate.

Wild that over a third of the voters still can’t be assed to make a decision.

Do a barrel roll!

I might weigh those as much or more than actual experience doing the job. New company vs old company with shit record? I feel like we should lean towards the new one but that’s weak to spinoff/new subsidiary companies from older ones with a trash rep.

I would hazard a guess that it’s because they seem to flex the budget every single time, which either means really shitty planning by a company that is trying to look competent or excess greed by the administration of said company to make them more money.

Maybe keep the cost plus but then add a tax increase on any executives running those companies/in charge of bidding. Something like revenues derived from government contracts get taxed without deductible and in a separate file from civilian business so they can’t do squirrely tax dodging.

Racing gets me if I can fully customize my vehicle and the changes actually have meaning.

Wouldn’t that open them up to other crimes like false advertising?

Is this the same dance as shuffling or is that somehow minutely different?