• ricecake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    See, you’re talking partisan politics, I’m talking “you literally have to pick someone”. We’ve had these candidates before. You already know which one you’re going to vote for. You picked your side four years ago when you were asked the same question.

    Beyond that though, there’s “parties” and then theirs “sides”. One side is xenophobic, homophobic and actively wishes harm on a lot of people. The other side doesn’t, for all their flaws.
    There are more parties than there are sides in the past few elections.

    By saying you think you should vote for someone who will be good for everyone, you’ve picked a side. The side that doesn’t want to do good for only the “right” people, or make sure only the “right” people get hurt.
    The only question is if you’ll vote for that side to win, or if you’ll let idealism or anger drive you to vote otherwise.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I shall, once again, for the 6th time in my life, hold my nose and vote for the milquetoast candidate the DNC has foisted on us. I wish we had RCV so I could vote for someone good, like Bernie, or heck I’d almost take Vermin Supreme at this point.

      • ricecake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Dude, have you actually read vermin Supremes platform, or rather his actual political philosophy and beliefs?

        I read through some of them once, and had the horrifying realization that the contemporary political figure that I think I agree with most closely is:

        • unelectable
        • best known for wearing a boot on his head

        I couldn’t find where a lot of his actual opinions got discussed a bit more formally, but this random video snippet from 2008 does a decent job capturing it.

        If I had (got? Got. I’d love to need to make the choice) to pick between a democratic socialist or a social anarchist, I think I’d honestly lean towards the social anarchist, all things being equal.

          • ricecake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Oh yeah, he’s totally not a viable candidate, but he does have an actual political philosophy and opinions that are surprisingly agreeable. He just lacks the actual political fortitude or will to get elected.