@[email protected] to Lefty [email protected]English • 5 days agoYep.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1195arrow-down122
arrow-up1173arrow-down1imageYep.lemmy.world@[email protected] to Lefty [email protected]English • 5 days agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•5 days agoIt sounds like he just threw out his best idea for it. Not a bad thought but could you imagine what would be shoved in there nowadays?
minus-square@phdepressedlinkEnglish8•5 days agoMore interesting I think is what it would have been at other points in history and whether this type of renewal would have been able to prevent the current shitshow. 20y might be a bit short as well, something more like 40y could make sense though.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•5 days agoAnd rather than wipe it out and start, maybe adjust a percent of it. However constitution law would be overridden more. The less stable, the less decided, current scotus aside.
It sounds like he just threw out his best idea for it. Not a bad thought but could you imagine what would be shoved in there nowadays?
More interesting I think is what it would have been at other points in history and whether this type of renewal would have been able to prevent the current shitshow. 20y might be a bit short as well, something more like 40y could make sense though.
And rather than wipe it out and start, maybe adjust a percent of it.
However constitution law would be overridden more. The less stable, the less decided, current scotus aside.