Rep. Joseph Morelle of New York, the top Democrat on the House Administration Committee, sent a letter to colleagues informing them of his intent to file the resolution, which would kickstart what’s traditionally a cumbersome amendment process.

“This amendment will do what SCOTUS failed to do — prioritize our democracy,” Morelle said in a statement to AP.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1472 months ago

    This is the only way to change that. I don’t have much hope that it’ll pass, though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            202 months ago

            He’s too virtuous. He hasn’t processed that anything he does is legal.

            So he leads be example. Or something.

            Maybe someone should explain it to him before 4 PM?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              It feels so Game of Thrones-ish. Democrats are going to act all high and mighty and virtuous, while Republicans are just going to be like Cersei Lannister, “Is this meant to be your shield, Lord Stark? A piece of paper?” Republicans will run them through and sleep well knowing they won, without a guilty conscience. The President should be acting now to protect the country, not waiting for the wolves to get into the hen house and then wringing their hands that there was nothing they could do about it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                102 months ago

                That’s pretty much it. Republicans are bring out the spiked maces and Dems are just trying to fisticuff they’re way out of it. Because virtue.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  72 months ago

                  Not even fisticuffs. They’re filing a motion to discourage mace spikes over a certain length.

                  Pending the approval of some unelected clerk rando with only symbolic authority, of course.

            • @gravitas_deficiency
              link
              English
              12 months ago

              After 11, but before 4, and not between 12:30 and 14:00 because that’s naptime

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          62 months ago

          Being free from the consequences of your actions does not give you absolute power and authority. He can’t fire them, because he never had that power. What he can do is have them swatted and kill them in official capacity, although he can still be impeached.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            42 months ago

            Trump signed an executive order and made much of the executive branch fire-able. Go far enough and that influence can turn into control over other parts of the government.

            There’s a path to effective termination.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              Nah, that one only works because the executive branch belongs to the president. It’s kind of like my boss saying there’s a new rule at my work and he can fire you at will from your work.

              It would be a really convenient way to go if it worked though…

        • @gravitas_deficiency
          link
          English
          52 months ago

          Under the new authority they’ve granted him, he can also “fire” them, if you get my meaning.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            you mean set their homes ablaze while they sleep because of an alleged terrorist Hamas cell in the basement?

            • @gravitas_deficiency
              link
              English
              -22 months ago

              As fucked up as the Gaza genocide is, it may surprise you to know that it’s not related to literally everything in the sphere of politics.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        Them actively denying legislature on a whim would be time consuming and bring us closer to congress impeaching the justices and removing them.

    • @gravitas_deficiency
      link
      English
      92 months ago

      It’s the only legislative way to change that.

      There is a way that Biden could change that completely unilaterally, but he’s not going to do it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      Impeachment. Impeachment is easier, more direct, and since the justices can theoretically interpret the amendment any way they wish far more likely to be effective.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        Yeah they’ve already wiped their asses with the spirit of the Constitution. There are currently in rules for the but not for me mode. It’s still a good gesture.