Beaver@lemmy.ca to Ranked Choice Voting@ponder.catEnglish · 6 months ago

Ranked-Choice Legality by American Jurisdiction

101

Ranked-Choice Legality by American Jurisdiction

Beaver@lemmy.ca to Ranked Choice Voting@ponder.catEnglish · 6 months ago

Chat

Scubus
link
fedilink
arrow-up
8·
6 months ago
The given reason is that the voters are too dumb to understand how rcv works. That is not a coincidence.
- kboy101222
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  4·
  6 months ago
  As someone that lives down here, they’re not entirely wrong…

Ranked Choice Voting@ponder.cat

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to the Ranked Choice Voting Community!

Voting is broken! Let’s fix it.

Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) is a voting system in which voters rank candidates by preference on their ballots. If a candidate wins a majority of first-preference votes, they are declared the winner. If no candidate wins a majority, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and votes for that candidate are redistributed to the remaining candidates, based on the next preference on each ballot. This process continues until one candidate has a majority. Learn more about how it works.

Why Ranked Choice Voting?

Prevents the tyranny of the middle
Encourages diversity of candidates
Discourages negative campaigning
Provides more choice for voters
Saves money by avoiding runoff elections

Community Rules

Respect each other’s opinions.
No misinformation. All claims must be backed by credible sources.
Be proactive and informative.

Sister Communities

FairVote Canada
Make one for your country!

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

7 users / day
8 users / week
62 users / month
1.18K users / 6 months
12 local subscribers
141 subscribers
102 Posts
216 Comments
Modlog