Macaulay Culkin might have convinced the billionaire to shun political ambition when they met on the film sequel, but didn’t

I’ve read the community rules and now that i’m posting the link directly instead of linking from the cited text, i think this is article has it’s place in this community.

if that’s not the case, can you help me understand why

edit: I’ve posted it on sunday/monday when it wasn’t 2 days old and it got deleted. i’m trying to understand if it’s the contents or the format (linking from the cited text from the text body) that got it deleted. I thought comments on the deleted post was interesting

  • @[email protected]
    1•2 months ago

    You’re what the French call “les incompetant”

    (just ensuring I clarify I am not directing this at you, NegativeLookBehind)

    • merde alorsOP
      0•2 months ago

      You’re what the French call “les incompetant”

      “les incompétents”, vous voulez dire?

      you reply to wrong comment with a spelling mistake. Your comment about compétence was it’s demonstration :)

      but, what do you mean? i’m curious. Who’s incompetent and why?

      i thought the article was cleverly written