• Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    What a weird article, ULA is just as commercial as SpaceX, and they’ve been launching all sorts of military payloads.

    Now, I get that the US government would rather not be dependent on a billionaire who is on very friendly terms with their geopolitical opponents. But that doesn’t mean SpaceX doesn’t exist.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      SpaceX doesn’t use Russian engines, though. That’s what this article is referring to, now all US rockets are free from Russian parts.

      • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        now all US rockets are free from Russian parts

        Technically this isn’t true. The US military no longer has any unfulfilled launch contracts that will use Russian engines, but the ULA still has some RD-180s that they will almost certainly use for future commercial launches. Today simply marks the end of the RD-180 as a means of launching military payloads.

    • Ydna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re absolutely correct - I toured the ULA Decatur booster faculty mere days ago. There’s spaceforce-branded parts bolted onto Centaur rockets using Russian engines all over the place. Now to be fair they also have an engine made in Washington too but this stuff takes a looooong time to make any changes.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      United Launch Alliance, which became the sole contractor certified to carry large US military satellites to orbit until SpaceX started launching national security missions in 2018.