China has secured a virtual monopoly over gallium, a critical mineral used to produce microchips in advanced military technologies. Failing to de-risk gallium supply chains could have serious security and economic consequences for the United States and its allies.
Plays stupid games, win stupid prizes as the saying goes.
Oh, I think you’ve given us plenty of proof of just how challenged you are. Your lack of self awareness is just a cherry on top. You’re like the embodiment of the Dunning-Kruger syndrome.
Any data that is not independently verified (ie, your hopeful propaganda), I don’t like.
Unlike you, I don’t chill for a single entity, I simply like people to be properly and fairly informed.
You can refer back to the article that has actual data from multiple countries that count the number of false data used in Chinese scientific articles. If you’re confused about actual data versus wishful thinking.
The DOD is already concluded that this won’t make a difference in gallium imports.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3227967/us-expected-get-around-chinas-export-controls-gallium-essential-component-american-military-radar
best of luck to them
Doubt they need luck.
Doubt you have any clue on the subject.
Just because you can’t read or interpret most of the articles or dara you spew out doesn’t mean the rest of us are similarly challenged.
Oh, I think you’ve given us plenty of proof of just how challenged you are. Your lack of self awareness is just a cherry on top. You’re like the embodiment of the Dunning-Kruger syndrome.
Well, of course you think that. From the false data you constantly propagandize, you demonstrably believe that no means yes and 1 = 4
Telling that Dunning-Kruger is the first technical term you bring up that you might actually know the definition of.
Ah yes, any data that you don’t like is obviously false. 😂
Any data that is not independently verified (ie, your hopeful propaganda), I don’t like.
Unlike you, I don’t chill for a single entity, I simply like people to be properly and fairly informed.
You can refer back to the article that has actual data from multiple countries that count the number of false data used in Chinese scientific articles. If you’re confused about actual data versus wishful thinking.