• idegenszavak
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    How is it MIT licensed and “NON-COMMERCIAL USE ONLY”. You can’t have both.

    This is misleading, because if you search for MIT licensed software this will show up, but it’s not that. Limiting commercial use means it’s not even considered open source but just source available

    • Nate@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      I believe the “non-commercial use only” is regarding the subtitles themselves, not the code. Im sure any commercial use using stolen subtitles from other services wouldn’t go over well

      • idegenszavak
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        So it means something like “Please do not use this for paid warez, I don’t want DMCA this repo”. Makes more sense.

        But sooner or later someone will do it, I don’t see that single sentence will stop a get quick buck script kiddie from an undisclosed eastern european country…

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If it’s licensed under MIT, you can use it under MIT. Additional marking doesn’t change that. You’d have to stop licensing it under the MIT license first, either by modifying it or using something else entirely.