• sugar_in_your_tea
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    If they also see a lower price, they’ll be more interested.

    And this doesn’t need to appeal to every car buyer, there’s a market for budget-friendly cars with a narrow use-case. 150 miles is plenty for a second car, and would probably not appeal to people looking for a primary car, whereas 250 miles kind of bridges that gap. Segment the market and it should do well.

    • skulblaka
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      These would also make bank as fleet vehicles for local deliveries or shuttle services.

    • bastion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lower price and longer life.

      50,000 complete cycles. That’s 136 years of complete empty to complete full. Most of these will outlast their mounting hardware.

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sure. Drop them in budget cars, and when the cars are ready to EOL, move the batteries to energy storage.

        • bastion@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yep. And decommissioning time? The sodium is all recyclable without major effort, and the Prussian Blue analogs can be discarded.

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s a lot more complex, and would drive up the price a lot. A simple EV with limited range has a lot of value for cases that only need short range.