• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11529 days ago

    Hot take: Since it’s a BSD licensed browser at some point in the future, there’s going to be a company that funds it brings it to mainstream with their flavor, and then will over throw chromium in time. Replace an ‘evil’ with another ‘evil’.

    • @sorrybookbroke
      link
      English
      56
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      All hail the cuck license, ensuring we end up back at the same place every single time.

      Good intentions and all that

    • @Jumuta
      link
      2429 days ago

      I like this project and just hope it was gplv3 or some similar copyleft license

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2528 days ago

        Ladybird is licences under BSD-clause 2. Which allows privatization of the code.

        IMO a web browser should be GPLv3, specially to not allow DRM bullshit in the browser.

        • Amju Wolf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1528 days ago

          AGPL, to prevent streaming (while not sharing the code).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            928 days ago

            Yeah AGPLv3 is the best if it’s going to be hosted as a service. Which a lot of web services do. Good point.

            • Amju Wolf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              226 days ago

              …to be fair browsers don’t really make sense for streaming, but you could call it “future proofing”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1728 days ago

      Yeah not a good licence at all for an independent browser. Idk if Servo MPL is a good license either. Do you know of any web browser that is GPL?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1228 days ago

      Luckily Gecko still exists. And who knows, maybe Servo will make it one day (but the odds are stacked against both them and Ladybird anyway).