• feannag
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    4 months ago

    They also don’t want to test the legality of forced arbitration on something like this, where precedent against it might be set.

    • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 months ago

      Especially when the judge will have seen the outrage and likely be influenced by it.

      I think you’re very right.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      That was my first thought… They initiated it for the precedent, they must have had reason to believe they wouldn’t get the ruling they wanted.