@[email protected] to [email protected] • 27 days ago“Something has gone seriously wrong,” dual-boot systems warn after Microsoft updatearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1162arrow-down13cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1159arrow-down1external-link“Something has gone seriously wrong,” dual-boot systems warn after Microsoft updatearstechnica.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 27 days agomessage-square37fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@gravitas_deficiencylinkEnglish2•edit-225 days agoWay to miss the nuance lol What I’m saying is that if a system claims to rigorously validate code that runs in a particular sensitive domain (here, ring 0), it should actually rigorously validate code. This was a process failure at the end of the day.
Way to miss the nuance lol
What I’m saying is that if a system claims to rigorously validate code that runs in a particular sensitive domain (here, ring 0), it should actually rigorously validate code. This was a process failure at the end of the day.