@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 25 days agoNo one’s ready for this: Our basic assumptions about photos capturing reality are about to go up in smoke.www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square185fedilinkarrow-up1464arrow-down145cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1419arrow-down1external-linkNo one’s ready for this: Our basic assumptions about photos capturing reality are about to go up in smoke.www.theverge.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 25 days agomessage-square185fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@WolfLinklinkEnglish2•24 days agoThere are some really subtle details experts can look at to detect Photoshop work, such as patterns in the JPEG artifacts than can indicate a photo was reocmpressed multiple times in some areas but not others.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-224 days agoThey can do the same with these. Only its a lot less subtle.
There are some really subtle details experts can look at to detect Photoshop work, such as patterns in the JPEG artifacts than can indicate a photo was reocmpressed multiple times in some areas but not others.
They can do the same with these. Only its a lot less subtle.